Process and system for tracking versions of field documentation data collection configurations in a complex project workflow system

ABSTRACT

A process is provided for capturing a state of a data input interface at a particular time in a complex workflow system. The data input interface provides an interface for entering actual data to populate a field document. The data input interface is modified on a plurality of occasions to accept input of additional or alternate types of actual data. Each modification of the data input interface is considered a version of the data input interface. The process involves saving a first version of the data input interface, which has been used to enter a first set of actual data. Modifications to the first version of the data input interface are then stored to create a second version of the data input interface. The second version of the data input interface is then activated allowing a second set of data to be entered via the second version of the data input interface. The first version of the data input interface is then deactivated to prevent further input of the actual data via the first version of the data input interface.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to the following applications, each ofwhich is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety: U.S.provisional application No. 60/323,928, entitled Process and System forComparing and Reconciling Estimated Data with Actual Data in a ComplexProject Workflow System, filed on 20 Sep. 2001; U.S. provisionalapplication No. 60/336,390, entitled Offline Manager, filed on 01 Nov.2001; U.S. provisional application No. 60/343,565, entitledModularization of a Process and System for Comparing and ReconcilingEstimated Data with Actual Data in a Complex Project Workflow System,filed on 18 Oct. 2001; U.S. provisional application No. 60/337,445,entitled Customization of Data Collection Methods in a Process forComparing and Reconciling Estimated Data with Actual Data in a ComplexProject Workflow System, filed on 18 Oct. 2001; and U.S. provisionalapplication No. 60/338,228, entitled Customization Manager—Versioning,filed on 06 Dec. 2001.

This application is also related to the following applications, whichare also each incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: U.S.patent application Ser. No. 09/801,016 entitled Method and Process forProviding Relevant Data, Comparing Proposal Alternatives and ReconcilingProposals, Invoices, and Purchase Orders with Actual Costs in a WorkflowProcess, filed 6 Mar. 2001, and U.S. patent application Ser. No.09/672,938, entitled Process and System for Matching Buyers and Sellersof Goods and/or Services, filed 28 Sep. 2000.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates in general to the field of automatedbusiness processes and systems therefore that match buyers with sellersof goods or services while also targeting marketing to such buyers. Morespecifically, the present invention relates to automated methods as partof a workflow process that provide for the comparison and reconciliationof estimated data to actual data determined at the conclusion of anevent in a multistage project.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In today's complex, fast paced economy, many projects exist that requirevarious goods and/or services to be provided by numerous organizations(hereafter, “sellers”) while also requiring relationships for providingand monitoring such goods/services to be quickly and efficientlyestablished. Examples of such projects include drilling for oil,commercial and/or residential construction, manufacturing complexobjects (for example, aircraft and special use objects), and providingspecialized services (for example, brokering excess power and bandwidth,and developing unique software products). When planning such projects,the person(s) responsible for the project (hereinafter, the “buyer”) isoften faced with the daunting tasks of: (1) designing the project andplanning the phases of implementation; (2) determining whichgoods/services are needed; (3) determining providers (sellers) of suchgoods/services; (4) establishing a dialogue with such sellers; (5)selecting at least one seller to provide one or more goods/services; (6)starting, managing, and monitoring the project until completion ortermination; (7) facilitating post-completion tasks (for example, payingsellers and other back-end processing); (8) analyzing the events of theproject to identify areas of improvement for future projects and (9)other related tasks.

Commonly, when faced with such a challenge, many buyers rely uponantiquated systems and processes for accomplishing those tasks necessaryimplement a project from start to post-completion. Such antiquatedsystems include, for example: utilizing business listings and otherdirectories to identify sellers; negotiating agreements with the sellersvia facsimile, telephone, and other non-real-time responsive systems;and making best-guess judgments as to areas in which future improvementsmay be realized. As a result, many buyers relying upon such antiquatedprocesses are often left behind in today's fast paced, Internet-driven,information economy. As such, a system is needed that allows buyers tobe efficiently matched with sellers, and projects monitored, managed,and coordinated through all phases of the project.

For example, when constructing a building, a general contractor mustdecide which seller will provide excavation services, what type ofmaterials to use, when the materials will be used, who will supply thematerials, who will use the materials (i.e., who will actually constructthe building) and other various factors. Currently, when constructing abuilding, the builder might use a Rolodex® or a personal data assistant(PDA) (for example, a PALMS® device) with contacts to choose preferredsellers to provide the desired goods/services. Upon identifying aseller, the buyer may then engage in a dialogue with the seller aboutthe project parameters, and may solicit proposals for methods tocomplete specific tasks. Since each seller may identify a unique mannerfor accomplishing the specified task, the buyer is often left todetermine, for example, which seller has identified the best approach,will provide the best value, and can best meet the schedule. Since suchdeterminations can be quite time consuming, buyers generally do not havetime to shop for other than a limited number of sellers for any givenproject. As such, new sellers on the market, and/or new techniques mayoften be overlooked.

Further compounding the problems faced by buyers in identifying andcoordinating goods/services from sellers is that sellers often dictatethe purchase processes used to acquire goods/services needed for theproject (e.g., auction, fixed price and quantity systems, and othersystems well known in the art). For some of these purchase processes,most of the essential terms of the agreement are dictated or controlledby the seller, while the buyer has little input over terms such asprice, delivery, location, and quantity. Examples of such seller drivenprocesses include retail, mail order, telephone, and some on-line salessystems. For example, a builder desiring to procure nails might berequired by a retail sales process or an on-line sales process topurchase nails only in bundles of 200, for a set price. Since the buyercannot modify the goods/services or terms or conditions of theprocurement process, the buyer's needs are often inadequately, untimely,and inefficiently fulfilled.

Additionally, recent automation of the aforementioned seller-drivenprocesses (for example, via the Internet) has not adequately addressedthis problem. While the new, automated processes generally enable abuyer to shop for goods and/or services, for example, without having totravel to the seller's location or obtain a catalog, such processes arecommonly characterized by sellers offering items of commerce underseller specified terms and conditions. Such processes do not allow abuyer to identify a project in terms of its specifications, and have thespecifications translated into requests for goods/services that are thenfulfilled in a timely and efficient manner by a seller providing therequested goods/services or suitable alternatives. Additionally, suchprocesses often do not identify sellers of specialty goods/services and,therefore, are often inadequate for the provisioning of goods and/orservices that are not commonly mass marketed. In short, a more efficientprocess of matching buyers and sellers is needed.

Examples of presently available buyer driven processes include biddingprocesses and auctions. Regardless of the process (whether bid-based orauction-based), a buyer is generally first required to identify specificgoods/services that are needed to complete a project. None of theavailable processes allow a buyer to specify a project in terms ofproject details or parameters that are then automatically converted intorequests for proposals, requests for specific goods, or other suchproposals. Additionally, none of the available processes provide readyaccess to information to help a buyer, or seller, determine theappropriate details necessary to adequately specify a project or respondto such a request. As is appreciated by those skilled in the art,converting specifications for complex projects into specific requestsfor goods/services is extremely time consuming, is often incomplete, andis extremely inefficient because the buyers often can not preciselyidentify and/or specify those goods/services available and needed tofulfill a project. As such, today's buyer driven processes do notprovide the degree of flexibility, specificity, and efficiency necessaryfor many buyers of goods/services. Therefore, a process is needed thatenables a buyer to procure those goods/services necessary to undertakeand complete a project by providing a project's specifications to anautomated process that facilitates the conversion of such specificationsinto requests for goods/service and matches the buyer with sellers ofsuch goods/services.

Additionally, once an agreement has been entered into to providegoods/services needed to fulfill a project, systems are not availablethat enable both buyers and sellers to monitor the progress of theproject, efficiently implement design changes, provide billing and otherback-office functions, and determine areas for improvement by utilizingknowledge based systems. Thus, a process is needed that enablesbuyers/sellers to enter into agreements for projects and monitor suchprojects from initialization through post-completion/termination.

Similarly, once goods have been delivered or a service has beenperformed, processes are not available that enable both buyers andsellers to efficiently compare and reconcile actual costs and projectoutcomes with the estimated costs and technical specifications providedby a seller in response to a service request, provide for a revision andapproval process, and ultimately provide invoices that accuratelyreflect the goods and services provided. With many complex projectsdeliveries are made and services are provided in discrete stages overthe course of the project. For example, a commercial response forlumber, for a particular project, may detail the various types, sizes,and pricing for the lumber while providing a final total price. However,the delivery may actually be performed in stages over the course of theproject. These services are generally documented by delivery tickets ortickets provided at the time deliveries are made and services rendered.In other instances, ongoing services may be recognized by ticketssubmitted on a regular basis, e.g., weekly or monthly.

Unfortunately, there is great difficulty in reconciling these ticketsand allocating them to the appropriate project. Many times tickets arenever received by the office accounting departments. For buyers, thismeans that they have no record of goods or services actually beingprovided. For sellers, this may mean that they are unable to or fail toinvoice a buyer for goods or services rendered. Often it is a nightmarefor buyer and seller accounting departments to keep track of ticketsbecause proper routing and coding procedures often are overlooked in thefield. As such, much time may be spent on the telephone attempting tocontact foremen at job sites to confirm deliveries or services renderedor with the seller to determine to which project the ticket relates.Fraud is also an issue as many times false invoices are presented andpaid under the assumption that the ticket was lost because it is toodifficult or time consuming to identify the related tickets. Thus aprocess is needed to enable such reconciliation of proposal prices andproject results with actual costs and technical specifications beforeapproval and invoicing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

At least one embodiment of the present invention is directed to aprocess and system that matches buyers (in exemplary embodiments herein“operators”) and sellers (in exemplary embodiments herein “serviceproviders”) of goods/services based upon specifications provided by abuyer for a project. Additionally, various embodiments of the presentinvention provide a forum for the negotiation of resulting agreements toprovide goods/services needed for a project, while also allowing buyersand sellers to monitor the status of the project and/or the provision ofthe agreed upon goods/services. Systems and/or processes are alsoprovided which enable sellers to directly communicate with a buyer,including providing documents and other information that are readilyaccessible by the buyer, the sellers, and others (e.g., engineers,subcontractors, project managers, and other project members) fromanywhere, at any time, via a suitable communications link. Further, thecompletion of post-task accomplishment activities, such as back-endaccounting and billing operations, reconciliation of proposed costs andother data with actual costs and other actual data, invoicing, resourcemanagement, and knowledge management may also be provided by variousembodiments of the present invention.

More specifically, a system and/or process is provided that, uponidentification of specifications for a project by a buyer, generates oneor more requests for goods and/or services needed to fulfill the projectand provides the requests to those sellers designated by the buyerand/or those sellers that can provide the requested goods/services. Itis to be appreciated that a “project,” as used in this description,includes activities involving single operations (for example, procuringcasing for a well), as well as activities involving numerous operations(for example, building a house), and is not to be construed as beinglimited to any specific classes of goods, services, activities, orprojects. In response to such requests, the sellers may submitproposals, request additional information, recommend changes to projectparameters and/or the goods/services requested, and perform variousother activities.

When utilizing the systems and/or processes of the present invention, abuyer may specify one or more parameters that describe a project.Examples of such parameters include the following: physical parameters(e.g., size, weight, height); functional parameters (e.g., able toaccelerate from 0 to 60 m.p.h. in less then 6.0 seconds); temporalparameters (e.g., to be delivered by Tuesday); financial parameters(e.g., to cost less than $10.00); transactional parameters (e.g., to bepaid by check or money order); and/or geographical parameters (e.g.,located in Colorado). The physical, functional, temporal, financial,and/or geographical parameters, or any other parameters that may beappropriate for completion of the project, are hereafter collectivelyreferred to as “parameters.” Various embodiments of the presentinvention also enable users to compare various versions of a givenproposal and/or different proposals for various purposes, for example,to manipulate the parameters in such proposals to ascertain differentresults based upon potential project outcomes. Thus, a process isprovided which facilitates the matching of buyers with sellers ofgoods/services based upon project parameters, and not necessarily uponthe specific identification of goods/services by a buyer.

Various embodiments of the present invention further enable buyers andsellers to access industry specific information, for example, to assistthem in determining and providing the necessary goods and services for agiven project. A knowledge management system may also be included as acomponent of the invention and may be used, in one respect, as a libraryof technical information to aid both buyers and sellers in formulatingand responding to various kinds of requests. Technical information mayinclude, for example, industry data, articles, general engineeringpublications, historical or archived data, and data specific to either abuyer's or seller's projects or team (e.g., company specific data). Asis commonly appreciated, company specific data may include operationaland transaction histories for projects and other data. Access to companyspecific data may be restricted to protect proprietary information, orit may be shared, for example, as between joint venturers involved in aspecific project.

The present invention, in at least one embodiment, facilitates thesharing of such company specific data, as desired and/or permitted byindividual companies. In many complex projects, various goods aredelivered by a seller for use at various points throughout the projectand documented by delivery tickets, even though the entire quantitiesand related total costs may have been indicated or estimated in a singletechnical and/or commercial response to the initial service request forthe project. Similarly, services provided by a seller over the course ofa project may be rendered and documented by what are known in someindustries as field tickets. Rather than merely providing an invoice atthe completion of the entire project, field tickets may be issued bysellers at various times during the project, for example, weekly,monthly, by hours expended, or by section completed.

In one embodiment of the present invention, a system and/or process isprovided for tracking, matching, comparing, reconciling, and/orapproving for payment delivery tickets or field tickets forgoods/services rendered at the project site. One element of this fieldapproval of delivery tickets process may provide for communicationsbetween buyers and sellers that are directly linked to the specificdelivery or field document in question. This process may be furtherenhanced by using an electronic version of a delivery document, oneexample of which is an eField-Ticket™ provided by WELLOGIX®, Inc. It isto be appreciated, however, that other versions of delivery tickets, inelectronic and other forms or methods of communicating field or otherconditions may be utilized in conjunction with the various embodimentsof the present invention. As such, collectively and individually,delivery tickets, field tickets, electronic tickets, and aneField-Ticket™ are herein considered to be synonymous and arehereinafter referred to as a “Field Document,” or on the variousWELLOGIX user interface embodiments as an “eFT,” in both the singularand plural context, as particular uses require. Further, it is to beappreciated that a Field Document may be generated, provided, accessedand/or utilized in a hardcopy and/or a soft copy embodiment. Morespecifically, a Field Document may be provided in a hard copy embodimentas a printed page, document, memo, report, invoice, Field Document orthe like. Similarly, a Field Document may be provided in a soft copyembodiment as a computer data file, on a screen display of a user or asystem device, as an audible text message or via any other known orhereafter discovered method and/or system for communicating informationto a person and/or to a computer or similar device.

Further, a historical record of the communications concerning thereconciliation and approval of payment for a specific delivery/FieldDocument may be provided to document and facilitate the process. In arelated manner, actual project data (for example, quantities of lumberactually delivered, quantities of concrete used, time taken to drill awell to a certain depth, and other actual project data) can be comparedand reconciled with amounts projected or estimated in technicalresponses to an original service request.

In one business scenario using a system or process embodiment of thepresent invention, an operator may award a job with a commercialresponse or a work order. Once the service provider has completed thedesignated work or an identifiable portion thereof, a Field Document maybe prepared and submitted to the operator for approval. This may beaccomplished, for one system embodiment, by logging into an Internetand/or Browser based system, such as the WELLOGIX® system, andcommunicating a Field Document (or an eField-Ticket™) to an operator.

In another embodiment of the present invention, an offline managerfeature may be utilized by which a service provider may submit a FieldDocument to an operator, or send the Field Document to another employeewithin his company via an online connection with an Internet or othernetwork connected server/web site, such as one provided by WELLOGIX, oroffline using an “Offline Component.” An Offline Component is hereindefined as a web page that may be accessed even when a connection cannot be established with a provider of the web page. An Offline Componenthas in some literature been called a “sitelet.” In short, utilizing theoffline manager feature of the present invention, a service provider canprepare a Field Document either online, for example, via the WELLOGIXsystem, or off-line, for example, via an Offline Component. Further,when an Offline Component is utilized, the Offline Component may beobtained directly, indirectly or even sent to them using, for example,Consilient technology, Microsoft.net™, or other wired or wirelesscommunication technologies. Further, it is to be appreciated that anOffline Component may be provided by other communication mediumsincluding, but not limited to, via computer readable mediums, IR beamedsignals, RF signals, fiber optic signals, and other mediums. When theservice provider has inputted the desired data into the Field Document,the Field Document may be communicated to the operator, to anothermember of the service provider company, or to others using wired and/orwireless communication technologies.

In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the offline managermanages Offline Components. Such Offline Components may be stored and/orutilized or created for a given project, for example, in a data array orother computer file data structure. The offline manager may also beconfigured to: 1) list Offline Components that have been checked out; 2)list who checked out an Offline Component including, for example, a dateand time stamp; 3) allow a user to cancel an Offline Component; and 4)list the type of Offline Component checked out. The offline manager mayalso allow a user, itself or others to cancel an Offline Component. Thenecessity to cancel an Offline Component may arise as a result of someparticular business need. For example, an Offline Component may need tobe cancelled when a first employee, who may be scheduled to perform workon a job site and is sent the Offline Component prior to leaving theoffice, is unable to perform the work and a second employee must performthe work in place of the first. In such a situation, the OfflineComponent may be cancelled, transferred and used by the second employee,regenerated or otherwise processed. The offline manager may also beconfigured to manage Offline Components that are currently offline, suchthat a user may determine whether any Offline Components require theirattention.

Depending upon their needs, different companies may use a Field Documentdifferently. For instance, some companies may use a Field Document tocapture rental equipment used at the drill site, while others may use aField Document to capture detailed time information, and yet others mayuse a Field Document to capture payroll and human resources information.Therefore, flexibility in how a Field Document is designed may beprovided so that a Field Document may be configured to display varioustypes of information to meet the needs of different companies and/orusers on a dynamic or static basis.

To meet this need, one embodiment of the present invention may include amodularization feature, whereby the format of the Field Document ismodular. For example, a modular Field Document may include multiplepages, instead of a single page, multiple sections, and/or otherpartitions. These partitions/sections/pages in a modular Field Documentenable a company to customize Field Documents by using only thosemodules the company needs instead of having one long form of which mostis not utilized. It is to be appreciated that a customizable FieldDocument may reduce the quantity and time necessary to communicate aField Document between the field, the front office and otherwise.Further, when modular Field Documents are provided and utilized, theamount of customization that can be done for each company that uses anembodiment of the present invention may be improved. Also, the amount oftime that development resources are allocated to build custom featureswithin an application may also be reduced.

Another embodiment of the present invention may include a customizationmanager that allows for easy customization of various screens to betterconform to a company's needs. Further, versioning may be provided, whichenables users to retrieve previous versions of Field Documents and/orother information that may be utilized in a system or processimplementing a version or embodiment of the present invention.

In one embodiment of the invention, a process is provided for capturinga state of a data input interface at a particular time in a complexworkflow system. The data input interface provides an interface forentering actual data to populate a field document. The data inputinterface is modified on a plurality of occasions to accept input ofadditional or alternate types of actual data. Each modification of thedata input interface is considered a version of the data inputinterface. The process involves saving a first version of the data inputinterface, which has been used to enter a first set of actual data.Modifications to the first version of the data input interface are thenstored to create a second version of the data input interface. Thesecond version of the data input interface is then activated allowing asecond set of data to be entered via the second version of the datainput interface. The first version of the data input interface is thendeactivated to prevent further input of the actual data via the firstversion of the data input interface.

These and other features and functions of the various system, processand/or user interface embodiments of the present invention are furtherdescribed herein with reference to the drawing Figures, the detaileddescription and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

FIG. 1 is an information and interface flow diagram providing anoverview of many of the operations supported by at least one embodimentof the present invention.

FIG. 2 is an exemplary flow diagram of a process which may be used toprocess a Field Document according to one embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 3 is an information and interface flow diagram depicting oneembodiment of the present invention for processing a Field Document andproviding payment thereof.

FIGS. 4A–B are flow diagrams depicting one embodiment of a process ofpreparing and pre-populating Field Documents based upon a commercialresponse.

FIGS. 5A–B are flow diagrams depicting one embodiment of a process ofpreparing and pre-populating Field Documents based upon a work order.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram depicting one embodiment of a process whereby aField Document can be reviewed, approved for payment, and/or designatedas held.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting one embodiment of a process whereby aservice provider can update a Field Document which has been reviewed byan operator, submit a Field Document for invoicing, or designate a FieldDocument for further review.

FIGS. 8A–B are exemplary screen shots of one embodiment of an award pagewhich may be utilized in an Internet or a Web browser based embodimentof the present invention, wherein a link to enter a Field Document intoa reconciliation system is provided.

FIG. 8C is an exemplary screen shot of one embodiment of a FieldDocument management page for an Internet or Web browser based embodimentof the present invention, wherein a list of submitted Field Documentsmay be provided for review.

FIGS. 9A–B are exemplary screen shots of two embodiments of FieldDocument summary pages in which pre-population tools are provided for anInternet or Web browser based embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 10A–C are exemplary screen shots of one embodiment of a FieldDocument template page for an Internet or Web browser based embodimentof the present invention in which time, materials, costs and/or fees maybe provided.

FIG. 11A is an exemplary screen shot of an embodiment of a FieldDocument template page for an Internet or Web browser based embodimentof the present invention, wherein various line item charge categorieshave been collapsed into individual windows.

FIG. 11B is an exemplary screen shot of the Field Document template pageshown in FIG. 11A after the “save” button has been selected and furtherproviding an interface with which to attach a file to a Field Document.

FIG. 11C is an exemplary screen shot of another embodiment of a FieldDocument template page for an Internet or Web browser based embodimentof the present invention, wherein the various line item chargecategories have been collapsed into individual windows and collaborationwindows for writing comments are provided.

FIG. 11D is an exemplary screen shot of the Field Document template pageshown in FIG. 11C after the “save” button has been selected and furtherproviding an interface with which to attach a file to the FieldDocument.

FIG. 11E is an exemplary screen shot of another embodiment of a FieldDocument template page for an Internet or Web browser based embodimentof the present invention in which an “approve” button is provided forapproving a Field Document.

FIG. 11F is an exemplary screen shot of the Field Document template pageof FIG. 11E after the “approve” button has been selected and furtherproviding an interface with which to attach a file to a Field Document,send a Field Document for approval, and/or send a Field Document toinvoicing.

FIG. 12A is an exemplary screen shot of a Field Document template pagein another Internet or Web browser based embodiment of the presentinvention providing for the creation of customized fields within theField Document.

FIG. 12B is an exemplary screen shot of a Field Document template pagein another Internet or Web browser based embodiment of the presentinvention showing one representation of how customized fields may bedisplayed on a customized Field Document.

FIGS. 13A–B are exemplary screen shots of a filtering tool for managingField Documents in an Internet or Web browser based embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIGS. 14A–B are flow diagrams of a process whereby a service provider isable to reconcile Field Documents according to one embodiment of thepresent invention.

FIGS. 15A–D are exemplary screen shots of one embodiment of a FieldDocument reconciliation tool for an Internet or Web browser basedembodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 16 is a flow diagram detailing a workflow history process formanaging Field Document reconciliation according to one embodiment ofthe present invention.

FIGS. 17A–H are exemplary screen shots of workflow history templatepages for an Internet or Web browser based embodiment of the presentinvention showing the information tracking entries for a Field Documentmade by a workflow history tool.

FIGS. 18A–G are exemplary screen shots of workflow history templatepages for an Internet or Web browser based embodiment of the presentinvention showing the information tracking entries for a Field Documentmade by a workflow history tool.

FIG. 19 is an exemplary flow diagram for one embodiment of the presentinvention depicting a process for assigning, managing, and trackingField Documents, both online and offline as an Offline Component.

FIG. 20 is an exemplary screen shot of a price list Offline Component.

FIG. 21 is a flow diagram for one embodiment of the present inventiondepicting an exemplary process for canceling Offline Components.

FIGS. 22A–C are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of the offline manager used for canceling Offline Components.

FIG. 23 is an exemplary screen shot for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a workflow tracking screen showing a cancelled OfflineComponent.

FIGS. 24A–C are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a job time and activity detail included in a modular FieldDocument.

FIGS. 25A–C are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of pricing page included in a modular Field Document.

FIGS. 26A–B are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a product list page included in a modular Field Document.

FIGS. 27A–D provide a flow diagram describing for one embodiment of thepresent invention a customization manager process.

FIGS. 28A–C are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a user interface which may be used to customize operatorscreens.

FIGS. 29A–H are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a user interface which may be used to customize serviceprovider screens.

FIGS. 30A–B provide a flow diagram describing for one embodiment of thepresent invention a process for versioning with the customizationmanager.

FIGS. 31A–B are exemplary screen shots for one embodiment of the presentinvention of a customization manager with versioning features.

FIG. 32 is an exemplary system for implementing the various processembodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A representative Internet or Web browser based embodiment of the presentinvention is depicted through a series of flow diagrams and screen shotsof web page templates from an Internet based application provided byWELLOGIX™ and its predecessors WELLBID™ and eNersection.com. Thoseskilled in the art appreciate, however, that embodiments of the presentinvention and the WELLOGIX embodiment, in particular, may varysubstantially or insubstantially in the features and functions providedby such systems without departing from, modifying, adding to, ordeleting from the scope of the present invention as described herein andexpressed in the claims.

FIG. 1 provides an information flow diagram depicting the variousoperations and processes of a WELLOGIX or other Internet or Web browserbased embodiment of a system 100, with particular reference to anembodiment designed primarily for the oil and gas industry. It is to beappreciated that this embodiment, and other embodiments discussedherein, may be used in other fields. More specifically, in thisembodiment, buyers are generally large “operators” involved in oil andgas exploration and production. These operators procure goods,equipment, and services to drill and operate oil and gas wells fromindividual sellers, which are the “service providers.” For example,goods can include drill bits and concrete; equipment can includedrilling rigs and transportation; and services can include drilling andcementing. Dashed line 160 marks the interface/integration boundarybetween those processes and/or services provided by the system 100 andthose provided by an operator's system. Similarly, dashed line 162 marksthe interface/integration boundary between those processes and/orservices provided by the system 100 and those provided by a serviceprovider's system. Also, dashed line 164 marks the boundary betweenoperator accessible and service provider accessible components in thesystem 100. It is to be appreciated, however, that these boundaries mayvary depending upon the configuration and/or capabilities of actualsystems implementing this or other embodiments of the present invention.

One embodiment of the workflow of a project proceeding through thesystem 100 may proceed as follows. An operator enters well projectinformation 102, preferably via an industry specific template forcapturing project parameters, into the system 100. The project parameterinformation may be entered by the operator manually, semi-manually (forexample, by using drop-down menus) or automatically, for example, byuploading the information to populate the template from a systeminformation database 114 (where prior projects may be suitably stored,for example, in a data array or other data structure), from anoperator-side information source 104 external to the system 100, and/orfrom other databases and/or sources of information. The operator-sideinformation source 104 may include internal data created or maintainedby the operator, data from any operator or third party application,and/or data from other information sources. Such data may also be storedin data arrays and other data structures. Additionally, such data may bestored as data objects in an object oriented database, such as oneprovided by Oracle®, and/or in a Structured Query Language format. It isto be appreciated, that these and/or other data structures may also beutilized throughout the various embodiments of the present invention.Further, in an Internet or other networked embodiment, data can beobtained from a variety of local and/or remote sources and that variousthird party processes and/or systems may be utilized, as necessary, toconvert and utilize such data in accordance with particular needs.

In the system 100, additional workflow operations may be undertaken toidentify and/or specify those parameters utilized to describe theproject. Similarly, various parameters may be used to specify theconfiguration of particular project related tasks or sub-tasks, such asspecifying wells 106 to be drilled for an oil and gas project. Utilizingproject level and task/sub-task/well level parameters, the system 100may be automatically, semi-automatically or manually instructed totransform these and/or other parameters into a technical request forquote 108. In one embodiment, a technical request may be generated bypopulating appropriate fields for the project in technical requesttemplates. The population of such fields may also be streamlined byutilizing data provided by other systems, such as, Knowledge Management(“KM”) systems.

More specifically, information needed, desired and/or helpful to thepreparation of technical requests may be available from several sources.Applications for modeling different aspects of a project may be madeavailable for use within the system 100. For example, in an oil and gasindustry embodiment, an internal fracture design module 112 may be usedby an operator to model how a formation can be fractured to enhance theoil or gas flow into the well. Further, parameters may be imported intosuch a modeling application module 112, and modeling information may beexported and/or used to populate a technical request template 108.

Further, the system information database 114 may also have a repositoryof industry specific parameters, information, references, links and/oraddresses to providers of such information. The system informationdatabase 114 may also be part of a KM system, for example, one thatautomatically seeks out, stores, and catalogs relevant information, andfurther identifies particular information collected with particularoperations, templates, or fields used to define parameters within thesystem 100.

A third source of information for constructing technical requests 108 inthe system 100 may be an operator-side information source 110. Thisinformation source 110 may provide, for example, historical datacaptured by the operator, common project specifications and standardsdeveloped by the operator, and/or other internal or external informationreferences. Information source 110 may also be a part of a singleoperator-side information source, such as one that includes informationsource 104.

A fourth source of technical information support may be solicited from,or provided by, a service provider. A service provider may also use atechnical response creation component 116 or a comparable component, forexample, one provided by the system 100. The service provider'stechnical response creation component 116 may access data and otherrelevant industry information from the internal information database 114in the system 100, from a service provider-side information and datasource 117, and/or from other sources of information. For example, inthis embodiment, a service provider with particular experience orexpertise could provide parameter information to help the operatordevelop a technical request 108. In other instances, service providersfamiliar with the operator's projects may convince the operator toinitiate a request for quote (“RFQ”) 118 by providing a technicalresponse 116 to the operator indicating an alternative method ofmanaging a project. Other types of complex projects, i.e., other thanthe oil and gas industry example, may have different components withgreater or fewer operations or templates to adequately and accuratelycapture and describe the parameters of any particular project andconvert those parameters into RFQs.

Ideally, the RFQ is eventually communicated to appropriate or chosenservice providers who may be notified 119 by the system 100 that such anRFQ has been made. The RFQ may or may not include any additionalinformation or data attachments. In certain embodiments, all serviceproviders or a selection of service providers may be designated toreceive the RFQ. The RFQ, including any technical request 108 andattachments, if any, may be reviewed 120, upon receipt thereof, by theservice provider and/or other recipients and a response (i.e., aproposal) or an alternate proposal may be provided to the operator. Forone embodiment, the service providers/recipients may prepare theresponse by exporting the data from the technical request 108 and anyattachments to a service provider-side system 122. . The serviceprovider may analyze and manipulate the data as needed using the serviceprovider's own applications and/or other applications in order todetermine and generate, if desired, an appropriate response. The serviceprovider may also import data provided in the RFQ into the system 122for integration into a response or proposal 126. The service providermay also import other information 124 into the system 124, for example,industry or company standards, internal or external references, or othertechnical or commercial data. Similar to the operator-side, the system124 may be configured to translate data, as necessary, to populate thosetemplates utilized and/or necessary to respond to an RFQ. Additionalinformation may also be provided as attachments to the response, orprovided as reference links, for example, hyperlinks, which enable anoperator to access information directly from the service provider orfrom a third party source via an Internet or other network connection.

The service provider may submit a completed response or proposal 128 tothe system 100. The response 128 may include a commercial response(i.e., one providing quantities, pricing, and similar transactionalinformation), a technical response 116 (i.e., one detailing the serviceprovider's rationale for the goods selected and/or a proposed method forproviding the services requested), a request for more information andother responses. The system 100 notifies 129 the operator when aresponse from the service provider has been lodged. The operator canreview the response 130 immediately upon notification or at a latertime.

At this point in the process, the operator has several options. If aservice provider provides a suggestion within the response 128 that theoperator finds particularly helpful, the operator may want to revise theRFQ 132 with the service provider's suggestion and re-bid 118 theproject to all of the service providers. In another instance, theproposals may have additional attachments of data, information, orreferences. In this case, the operator may want to review 134 thisadditional information by accessing it from remote sources or processingthe data on operator-side applications 136.

Within the service providers' response(s), alternate solutions forcompleting the project may be offered by different service providers orby a single service provider. The operator may wish to compare thesealternate responses 138, if any, to determine the best method forcompleting the project. Alternatively, the operator may determine thebest price between multiple service providers of the same goods orservices. If an alternate response is particularly desirable, theoperator may wish to revise the RFQ 140 with the suggestion and resubmita revised RFQ 118 to the service providers. Once the operator hascompared a desired portion or all of the possible proposals andalternatives, the project, or portions thereof, may be awarded 142 toone or more service providers. Financial information detailing theproject award is preferably transmitted to accounting, sales, and otherfinancial management systems of both the operator 146 and the serviceprovider 144.

As the service provider completes performance on the project, itprovides actual performance data 148 to the system 100. This actualperformance data preferably includes both costs for the goods andservices provided, and information about the conditions encountered thatthe parameters attempted to define. Actual performance data may beprovided by service provider-side systems 150 such as accountingprograms, and in the case of oil and gas projects, by entry into FieldDocument(s) (as described herein below in greater detail). Morespecifically, a Field Document attempts to capture and/or describe manyof the actual results of a project, in terms of financial, functionaland/or other types of parameters. In general, a Field Document providesactual data, measurements or observations taken during the performanceof the project. Such actual data observed may be provided to the system100 using wired and/or wireless processing and communicationstechnologies. The actual performance data may be used to updateconfiguration parameters 152 with the actual information to aid in therequest process for future projects involving the same or similarparameters. This actual information or data may further be stored by theoperator system 154 for historical reference purposes or otherwise.Actual cost information may also be used by the system 100 to reconcile156 purchase orders, field actuals, and final invoices in order tofacilitate the expeditious and appropriate payment of service providersby operators.

In many industries, contracts for complex projects are often negotiatedand entered into on a time and materials basis. Proposals from serviceproviders generally indicate the time involved in providing necessaryservices and the quantity of materials they believe will be necessary tocomplete a given task for a given project. But, pricing is often basedupon a per unit basis of time and materials. Therefore, the actual costsand fees incurred for a project may be higher or lower than the bid orcontracted for price .

For example, in the construction industry, a shortage of constructionmaterials or skilled labor in a certain region can drive project costsbeyond the proposal because of higher priced substitute materials or theability of labor to demand higher wages. Similarly, in the oil and gasindustry, a drilling team may encounter an unforeseen-operationalproblem that increases the time necessary to reach a desired well level,thereby increasing the cost of the project. In time and materialsprojects such as these, the operator typically continues to manage theproject through its completion despite time and cost overruns. Throughongoing management of the parameters, however, the operator is able tomake decisions concerning any available options to reduce the time andcost.

Returning to the embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 1,the system 100 enables a user to immediately begin the invoicing processfor time, services, and materials actually used in a job or event of theproject. In many industries, a “delivery Field Document” providesevidence of the delivery of a certain quantity of goods to a projectsite. In the oil and gas industry, discrete quantities of servicesrender are documented by Field Documents. In other industries, immediatedocumentation of goods/services may be called an “actual.” For thepurposes of the function of the processes described herein, the terms“delivery Field Document,” Field Document, and “actuals” are synonymous.Usually a representative of the operator either visits or oversees theproject site to ensure that the work is progressing and Field Documentsare documented accordingly.

At the conclusion of the job or a discrete event, the service provider'srepresentative may prepare a Field Document detailing the actual workperformed, time taken, and materials and equipment used, with therelated costs and fees for the job. The operator's representative mayapprove payment directly from the Field Document or hold for paymentuntil receipt of the official invoice. In many instances the FieldDocument merely operates as a verification that services have beenperformed, but not as a payment authorization. In the regular course ofmatters, there may be times when there is a discrepancy between theactuals reflected in the Field Document, the purchase order based uponthe service provider's proposal, and the final invoice for the job.These discrepancies ultimately require reconciliation.

The Field Document process is similar to the project management controlprocess in the construction industry. Before submitting invoices to theoperator for work performed on a construction project, the serviceprovider's work must usually first be approved by the field projectmanager, or perhaps a government certification officer, to give theoperator assurance that the work was performed according tospecifications. Many other industries use similar controls for ensuringappropriate performance from service providers, and various embodimentsof the present invention provide an environment for the management andtransfer of such approval information and invoicing.

Processing of a Field Document

For the system and process embodiment shown in FIG. 1, once a serviceprovider completes a project, operation 210 of FIG. 2, a Field Documentreflecting the actual work performed, goods and equipment used, andcosts thereof may be prepared. Desirably the Field Document is preparedusing a system and devices which facilitate communications over localand/or remote networks, such as the Internet, a private network, apublic network, a local area network (LAN), a wireless local areanetwork (WLAN), a wide area network (WAN), or any other type of network,operation 220. When the service provider's representative confirms theentries, notification that the Field Document is ready for review iscommunicated to the operator's representative, operation 230. In oneembodiment, the service provider accesses the Field Document via awireless network connection from the field. In the alternative, if theproject site is so remote that it may be impractical or impossible toconnect with a wired or wireless network, the invoicing environment maybe provided locally on the service provider's equipment and laterinterfaced with the system 100 when access to a network connection isavailable. The operator's representative, if present at the project sitecan approve the Field Document or negotiate changes before confirmingthe Field Document on the system. If the operator's representative isnot at the project site, the operator's field and/or officerepresentative may access the Field Document from the network once theField Document is entered into the system. The system 100 facilitatesthe interchange between operator and service provider to reconcile anyvariances between the Field Document, purchase order, and the actualinvoice(s) submitted by respective service providers.

Once a Field Document is issued and approved, the system 100 may passthe invoice information from the Field Document to the operator'saccounting or “back office” system for payment processing, operation240. If the Field Document is not approved by the operator'srepresentative, the Field Document actuals may still be passed to theoperator's accounting system. In either case, payment processing maythen include reconciliation of the Field Document with the serviceprovider's final invoice before payment is made, operation 250.

Integration of Field Documents with Accounting and Office Systems

Additionally, the system may be configured to integrate the operator andservice providers' accounting systems. As shown in FIG. 3, for anotherembodiment of the present invention, information transfers may occurautomatically or upon command, for example, via a computer-to-computerelectronic transfer, between the system 300, the operator's accountingsystem 302, and/or the service provider's accounting system 304. Suchinformation transfers may occur over any suitable communicationsnetwork. Further, for one embodiment, the information transfer may beaccomplished by implementing interface integration tools 306, forexample, Vitria®, Inc. software, in both the operator's accountingsystem and the service provider's accounting system. It is commonlyappreciated that Vitria® software is designed to interface betweenlarge-scale enterprise resource planning software systems such as thoseprovided by SAP®, J D Edwards®, and others. The system may alsointerface with such typical accounting software systems as QuickBooks®or Peach Tree®. However, the various embodiments of the presentinvention are not limited to the use of Vitria or any other softwareapplications or systems and may be configured, as desired, to utilizeany software applications which enable back-end accounting and businesssystems to interface and communicate data between operator and serviceprovider systems.

Referring again to FIG. 3, the system may also be configured toreconcile 316 a Field Document against a proposal award 312 or otherform of a purchase order. Further, the system may be configured toprovide for manual, semi-automatic or automatic payment authorizations314. Additionally, the system may be configured to utilize interfaceintegration tools 306 to match and reconcile 316 an invoice 310 againsteither approved or held Field Documents 318 and coordinate payment 314from the operator's accounting system 302. If the system is unable toreconcile a Field Document with an invoice or purchase order, the systemmay also be configured to flag the Field Document for review andapprovals before payment is made and/or other project related tasks areaccomplished. As such, this embodiment facilitates the early and oftenreconciling and approval of Field Documents such that work discrepanciescan be timely addressed and delays in the project minimized.

Pre-population of Field Documents

A method by which one embodiment of a workflow system may pre-populate aField Document and submit a Field Document to an operator is detailed inthe flow diagrams of FIGS. 4A and 4B. As shown, the method preferablybegins when a user accesses a bid award page for a particular commercialresponse (operation 400). The bid award page generally includes projectlevel information, parameters associated with a specific bid proposal,commercial response information, and links, if any, to submitted FieldDocuments (operation 402). When a user selects a link to a specificField Document summary page for the commercial response (operation 404),the system displays a summary page listing those Field Documentspreviously created for that commercial response (operation 406), if any.If the user selects an option for creating a new Field Document(operation 408), the system queries whether any old/existing FieldDocuments exist(operation 410). If there are any old Field Documents,the system queries the user as to whether to pre-populate the new FieldDocument with data from an old Field Document (operation 412). Dependingupon the user response, the system may take several actions.

If the user would like to pre-populate the new Field Document with datafrom a previous Field Document, the system determines whether multipleold Field Documents exist (operation 414). If there is only one previousField Document, the system automatically populates the new FieldDocument with data from the old Field Document (operation 416). If thereare multiple old Field Documents, the system determines whether the userhas selected a particular old Field Document to use for the populationdata (operation 418). If the user has not selected one of the old FieldDocuments, the system requests the user to select a Field Document(operation 420). The system then queries the user as to whether the userwants to pre-populate the new Field Document with the identified oldField Document (operation 412). If the user has already selected aparticular old Field Document, the system automatically pre-populatesthe new Field Document with data from the selected old Field Document(operation 422).

If the user does not wish to pre-populate the new Field Document withdata from an old Field Document, the system determines whether data froma commercial response can be used to populate the new Field Document(operation 424). If data exists, the system queries the user as towhether to populate the new Field Document with the data provided in thecommercial response. (operation 426). If pre-population is not desired,the system generates and displays a blank Field Document for manualpopulation by the user (operation 428). On the other hand, if the userdoes want to populate the new Field Document with data obtained from thecommercial response, the system will automatically populate the newField Document(operation 430).

Once the new Field Document has been pre-populated with previouslycollected data or newly populated, the user may make changes to suchdata, as desired. After any additions or changes have been made by theuser, if any, the system stores the data (operation 432). The systemcalculates a total cost for the services performed and anygoods/products used and enters a total on the new Field Document(operation 434). If the service provider adds any comments or additionalinformation to the Field Document, such information may also be storedwith the Field Document (operation 436). The system saves the new FieldDocument on a workflow system, such as a system embodiment shown in FIG.1 or FIG. 2. The new Field Document, generally, may be accessed throughthe system by others (operation 438). The system may also be configuredto notify the user of the ability to attach files and other informationto the new Field Document. Such attachments may provide, for example,supporting documentation or data for review by the operator (operation440). At this point or at other times, the system may be configured toperform a query to determine whether any files have been attached(operation 442). If so, the system may store the files to the workflowplatform or other systems and provide links between the files and thenew Field Document (operation 444).

The system also queries whether the new Field Document is ready forsubmission to the operator (operation 446). If so, the system notifiesthe operator that a new Field Document is available for review(operation 448). If the service provider is not ready for the new FieldDocument to be submitted to the operator for review, the system may beconfigured to not notify the operator or otherwise make the new FieldDocument available for review and to indicate that the Field Document isstill a draft (operation 450).

Generation of New Field Documents

In a similar manner, one embodiment of the present invention may providea system which facilitates the generation of a new Field Document basedupon a work order. Generally, pre-population of Field Document is notpossible when a work order is the basis for the Field Document. Thiscondition generally exists because work orders usually relate to needsthat arise in the field and are only partially, if at all, addressed inthe terms of a commercial response. As depicted in FIGS. 5A and 5B, upona user selecting a link to a Field Document summary page for a workorder (operation 500), the system may be configured to present a summarypage providing a listing of those Field Documents, if any, previouslycreated for a specific work order (operation 502). Upon the userselecting an option for creating a new Field Document (operation 504),the system determines whether an old Field Document exists(operation506). If an old Field Document exists, the system queries the user as towhether the user desires to pre-populate the new Field Document(operation 508). Depending upon the user response, the system may takeseveral actions.

If the user desires to pre-populate the new Field Document, the systemdetermines whether multiple old Field Documents exist (operation 510).If only one old Field Document exists, the system populates the newField Document with data from the old Field Document (operation 512). Ifmultiple old Field Documents exist, the system queries the user as towhether to use data in a particular old Field Document to populate thenew Field Document (operation 514). If the user does not select one ofthe old Field Documents, the system prompts the user to make a selection(operation 515). The system then queries the user as to whether the userwants to pre-populate the new Field Document with data from an old FieldDocument (operation 508). Referring again to operation 514, if the userhas selected an old Field Document, the system automaticallypre-populates the new Field Document with data from the selected oldField Document (operation 516). If the user does not wish topre-populate the new Field Document with data from an old FieldDocument, or there are no old Field Documents associated with the workorder, the system generates and displays a blank Field Document forpopulation by the user (operation 518).

Once the new Field Document has been pre-populated or a blank FieldDocument provided with new data provided by the user, and after anyadditions or changes have been made by the user, the system stores thedata (operation 520). The system then calculates the total costs ofservices performed and products used as specified in the new FieldDocument or as otherwise specified (operation 522). The service providermay also add any comments and/or additional information to the new FieldDocument, such comments and/or additional information may also be savedand/or stored with the new Field Document (operation 524). The systemsaves the new Field Document preferably such that it is accessible, viathe workflow system, by authorized users (operation 526). The systemnext notifies the user of the ability to add file attachments to theField Document to provide any supporting documentation or data forreview by the operator (operation 528). The system performs a query todetermine whether any such files have been attached (operation 530). Ifso, the system stores the files, desirably with the workflow platform,and provides links them to the via the new Field Document (operation532). The system then queries whether the new Field Document is readyfor submission to the operator (operation 534). If the user indicatesyes, the system notifies the operator that a new Field Document isavailable for review (operation 536). If the service provider is notready for the new Field Document to be submitted to the operator forreview, the system does not send notification to the operator orotherwise make the new Field Document available for review anddesignates the new Field Document as being a draft Field Document(operation 538).

Reviewing Field Documents

As shown in FIG. 6, one embodiment is provided of a process forreviewing a Field Document by an operator after the Field Document hasbeen submitted by a service provider. As shown, this process preferablybegins with the operator receiving a notification that a Field Documenthas been submitted and is available to access and review (operation600). When the operator accesses a particular commercial response, atleast one Field Document related to the commercial response is presentedto the operator for review (operation 602). Upon the operator selectinga particular Field Document, for example, from a summary list,(operation 604), a read only version of the Field Document may bedisplayed for review by the operator (operation 606). However, awritable versions of the Field Document may also be provided inalternative embodiments. If any comments are provided by the operator,these are suitably saved. Such comment may be inputted into a fieldspecifically provided for such comments (operation 608). Similarly,comments made by the service provider relating to the Field Document orotherwise may also be saved. Comments by a service provider may, forexample, be inputted into a second input field (operation 610).

Upon receiving an indication from the operator, the Field Document maybe saved in a workflow system which provides to authorized users(operation 612). While the save operation is depicted as occurring inoperation 612, it is to be appreciated that a Field Document may besaved at any time. Also, notifications may be provided to the operatorthat files may be attached to the Field Document. Such attachments mayinclude, for example, supporting documentation or data for review by theservice provider or other authorized users (operation 614). Further, aquery may be issued in order to determine whether any files have beenattached to the Field Document (operation 616). This query may also berepeated throughout the process as desired. If a file has been attachedto a Field Document, the file may be suitably stored with links beingprovided, as desired, to the Field Document and/or from the FieldDocument to the file (operation 618).

At this point, a determination may then be made as to whether the savedField Document has been approved for invoicing (operation 620). If theField Document has been approved, the Field Document may be suitablydesignated as approved (operation 622) and the service provider may benotified that the Field Document has been reviewed and approved by theoperator (operation 626). If the Field Document has not been approved,the Field Document may be designated as held for approval and theservice provider suitably notified that the Field Document has beenreviewed by the operator but has not been approved and that the FieldDocument is available for review, revision and/or resubmission by theoperator (operation 626).

Invoicing Field Documents

As shown in FIG. 7, one embodiment of a process for revising and/orsubmitting for payment a Field Document that has already been reviewedby an operator is provided. This process generally begins when a serviceprovider is notified that the operator has reviewed a Field Document andthe operator again accesses the related commercial response (operation700). When a user selects a link to the Field Document summary page forthe commercial response, a summary page providing a listing of all FieldDocuments related to the commercial response may be provided (operation702). When the service provider selects a Field Document previouslyreviewed by the operator, the selected Field Document is suitablypresented (operation 704). If any internal comments are made by theservice provider, for example, in a field specifically provided for suchcomments, these comments may be suitably stored (operation 706).Similarly, comments by the service provider for the operator may also besuitably entered, for example, in a second input field provided for thatpurpose, and/or suitably stored (operation 708). Further, changes, ifany, by the service provider to the Field Document may also betemporarily or permanently stored (operations 710). Once any desiredchanges have been made to the Field Document, the Field Document may besuitably saved to a platform, server or other system implementing thisprocess. The saving of the Field Document may be accomplishedautomatically, on a periodic basis, and/or upon input from the serviceprovider(operation 712).

Further, the process also enables a service provider to add fileattachments to the Field Document. Such file attachments may provide anysupporting documentation or data for review by the operator. Suchattachments may also, for example, be provided for invoicing purposeswhen the Field Document has been approved (operation 714). Queries mayalso be accomplished, as necessary, to determine whether any files havebeen attached to a Field Document (operation 716) and to save suchattachments to a suitable system or workflow platform. Links betweensuch attachments, if any, and the Field Document may also be provided(operation 718).

At this point in the process, a determination may be made as to whetherthe Field Document has been approved for payment by the operator(operation 720). If approved, a determination may be made as to whetherthe Field Document has been designated as ready for invoicing (operation722). If so, the data necessary to pay an invoice may be extracted fromthe Field Document and suitably communicated to a designated accountingand invoicing system (operation 724). In certain embodiments, theprocess of communicating data to an accounting system may beaccomplished via a network. In other cases, the accounting systems maybe provided with a system implementing this process. As such, it is tobe appreciated that local and/or remote systems may be used andinterconnected in order to facilitate the before mentioned processes.

Further, when the Field Document has been approved by the operator, buthas not been designated for invoicing by the service provider, serviceproviders may display and edit the Field Document, as desired(operation704).

Additionally, when the Field Document has not been approved by theoperator, a determination may be made as to whether the Field Documenthas been or should be designated for resubmission to the operator(operation 726). If not, the Field Document, and/or any changes thereto,may be suitably saved for later review and revision by the serviceprovider (operation 728). If the Field Document has been designated forresubmission, the updated Field Document may be saved for future accessand review by the operator (operation 730). Appropriate notification mayalso be provided to the operator regarding the availability of therevised and saved Field Document for further review (operation 732).

User Interface for Generating a Field Document

As mentioned previously hereinabove, various embodiments of the presentinvention provide systems and processes for generating a Field Document.It is to be appreciated that such systems and/or processes may generatevarious user interfaces or series thereof, including those providedaudibly and/or visually, which users may utilize to generate, edit,review, revise and/or approve Field Documents. One such embodiment of anuser interface is shown in FIGS. 8A–8C. As shown, in FIG. 8A, an userinterface may be provided as a Web page which can be displayed on a Webbrowser, such as Microsoft' Internet Explorer® or Netscape's Navigator®.

More specifically, one particular instantiation of an user interface,provided by a system implementing at least one embodiment of the presentinvention, that may be utilized to initiate the Field Documentpreparation process is depicted. In order to initiate the Field Documentprocess in this embodiment, a service provider preferably accesses a BidAward page 800 which may be configured to present Project Levelinformation 802 as well as those parameters which relate to a specificrequest for which the proposal was awarded 804 (as shown in FIG. 8B).

Further, this embodiment of a the Bid Award page 800 includes a ViewField Document button 806, which provides a hyperlink or other link to aField Document. Upon selection of such button 806, a user desirably ispresented with a Field Document process page, at least one embodiment ofwhich is shown in FIG. 8C. As shown, this page includes a list ofpreviously created Field Documents 808 for a given project. Uponselecting a link to a Field Document item from the list, a previouslysaved and/or submitted Field Document, that has been prepared for aspecific request, may be reviewed. Additionally, a link or button 810may be provided which enables one to create a new Field Document.

In another embodiment of the present invention, multiple Field Documentsmay be associated with a single commercial response. In this embodiment,multiple, discrete aspects of an ongoing, complex project may beaccounted for at the time the service is performed, rather than havingto wait until the end of the entire project. Further, by providing forthe linking and reconciling of multiple Field Document(s) withassociated commercial response(s), performance and budget issues may bereviewed as the project progresses. Additionally, since multiple FieldDocuments for a single commercial response may be very similar, thisembodiment provides for the pre-population of Field Documents fromseveral sources of data.

User Interface for Reviewing a Field Document

When a Field Document already exists for a particular project, a systemimplementing an embodiment of the present invention may be configure topresent a service provider with a user interface which enables theservice provider to review summary information relating to one or moreField Documents. An example of such a user interface is shown in FIG. 9Aas a Field Document summary template 900. More specifically and asshown, the Field Document summary template 900 may include a headerwhich identifies a particular project for which one or more FieldDocuments have been submitted. In an oil and gas embodiment, as shown inFIG. 9A, the header may include the identity of the operator 902, theproject name 904, the well name 906, the hole section 908, and theservice type 910. Further, the service type 910 may include a link whichenables a service provider or other user to access additional and/ormore detailed information about a parameter(s) of a given project. Thesefields may also be customized, as needed. For example, when well or holesection information for a discrete project is not available, the wellname 906 and hole section 908 fields may not be shown in the headerinformation.

The Field Document summary template 900 may additionally provide summaryinformation for existing Field Documents previously populated. Thissummary information may include, for example, a Field Document referencenumber (i.e., an EFT ID) 912, the date the Field Document was created914, the name of the person who created the Field Document 916, afunctional link to access and review the most recent version of theField Document 918, the status of the Field Document 920 (e.g., whetheror not the Field Document has been approved ), the amount of chargesdetailed in the Field Document 922, the estimated charges as originallyspecified in a commercial response, if at all, 924, and a link to theworkflow history of the Field Document 926.

When creating a new Field Document, for example, when one or more FieldDocuments already exist, the Field Document summary template 900 mayalso be configured to provide the service provider/user with choices forpre-populating the Field Document. For example, in the embodiment shownin FIG. 9A, the service provider is provided the choose of whether to:not pre-populate the Field Document 934 and instead manually enter newinformation; pre-populate from a commercial response 936 (wherein theField Document is populated with information obtained from thecommercial response 936 using a process similar to that previouslydescribed hereinabove with reference to when a user initially generatesa Field Document); and pre-populate the Field Document from an existingField Document/EFT 938. As shown, the service provider/user suitablyselects one of these options (or other options, when available), forexample, by clicking a radio button associated with the particularchoice. Additionally, if the new Field Document is to be populated bydata from a previous Field Document, a radio button 928 associated withthe particular previous Field Document may be selected to indicate thedesired data.

Further, by selecting a “Create New Field Document” button 940, a newField Document may be populated by the system. Also, when the “ReconcileCommercial Response and Field Document(s)” button 930 is selected, asystem implementing this embodiment may be configured to generate areconciliation tool template, one example of which is described infurther detail herein below.

The system may also allow one or more new Field Documents to bepre-populated when the Field Documents are based upon a work order. Incontrast to a commercial response, a work order is generally a documentissued in the field requesting a discrete project be performed that wasnot considered in an original bid request or commercial response. Forexample, it may be necessary to construct a fence around a project siteto keep out unanticipated trespassers (perhaps cattle on range land).When a work order template is provided for a particular project, theservice provider may choose a function to create Field Documents for thework order. Further, when no previous Field Documents have been createdfor the work order, a system, implementing an embodiment of the presentinvention, may be configured to create an initial blank Field Document,for completion by the service provider or others. For such anembodiment, generally, it is not desirable to pre-populate a FieldDocument(s) with information obtained from a work order because a workorder is commonly a request by an operator to have services performedrather than an estimate by a service provider to provide such services.Or in other words, a work order generally provides actual costs ratherthan estimates of such costs, and thus, there is commonly no valueobtained by reconciling a work order against a Field Document However,in those rare cases where a work order does provide an estimate, thevarious embodiments of the present invention may be suitably configuredto reconcile Field Documents against work orders.

Referring now to FIG. 9B, when a Field Document already exists for aparticular work order, at least one embodiment of a system of thepresent invention may be configured to present the service provider orothers, via a suitable user interface, a Field Document summary template942 which may be specifically tailored to a specific work order. TheField Document summary template 942 may include header information toidentify the particular project associated with the work order for whichthe Field Documents have been submitted. As discussed previously withreference to FIG. 9A, in an oil and gas embodiment, such headerinformation may include an identity of the operator 944, a project name946, a well name (if applicable), a hole section (if applicable), and/ora service type 948. The service type 948 may also include a link to thework order entered by the operator which enables the service provider toaccess more detailed information about the parameters of the project.

As shown in FIG. 9B, this embodiment of a user interface of a FieldDocument summary template 942 may additionally include summaryinformation for existing Field Documents previously populated. Thissummary information may include, for example, a Field Document referencenumber 950, the date the Field Document was created 952, the name of theperson who created the Field Document 954, a functional link to accessand review the most recent version of the Field Document 956, the statusof the Field Document 958 (i.e., whether or not it has been approved bythe operator), the actual charges detailed in the Field Document 960,and a link to the workflow history of the Field Document 962, to bedescribed in greater detail below. It is to be appreciated thatadditional or less information may also be provided, as particularimplementations require.

When one or more Field Documents already exist for a given project, theField Document summary template 942 may also be configured to providethe service provider/user with various options for pre-populating aField Document. These options include: not pre-populating the FieldDocument 970 and instead manually entering new information, and anoption to pre-populate the Field Document from an existing FieldDocument/EFT 972. A selection of either of these options may be suitablymade, for example, by clicking a radio button associated with aparticular choice.

Additionally, when the new Field Document is to be populated by datafrom a previous Field Document, a radio button 964 associated with theprevious Field Document may be selected by the service provider/user toindicate the desired data to be used in the new Field Document. When thecreate new Field Document function 974 is selected, the system proceedswith generating a new Field Document which has been populated by thesystem as desired by the service provider. A service provider mayfurther select the reconcile Field Documents function 930 from the FieldDocument summary template 942 to connect with reconciliation tooltemplate, which is described in further detail herein below.

User Interface for Inputting Actual Costs in a Field Document

Referring again to FIGS. 8C, 9A and/or 9B, once a service provider/userselects a “Create New Field Document” button 810, 940, or 974 at leastone embodiment of a system implementing the present invention may beconfigured to present a Field Document template page 1002 (as shown inFIGS. 10A–10C). As shown, the Field Document template page 1002 providesan user interface via which a service provider/user may enter the costsof goods and services and/or other information related to a specificproject request. More specifically, in the embodiment shown in FIGS.10A–10C, project level information 1004 may be pre-populated into thetemplate as may information obtained from previous proposals or purchaseorders if any. Such information may be pre-populated automatically orupon request by a service provider or other users.

Further, the template 1002 may be used to enter other informationincluding, but not limited to, temporal information about the workperformed on the project 1006, descriptions and prices of servicesperformed 1008, descriptions and prices of products and materials used1010, and descriptions and costs of third party services utilized by theservice provider in completing the project 1012. The system may also beconfigured to total costs for the services performed and products usedand to provide such totals in at least one field 1014. The system andtemplate may also be configured such that the service provider/user mayenter any comments or explanations about entries and charges in theField Document in a comment dialogue box 1016.

Information entered into the Field Document template page 1002 may alsobe saved as desired, for example, the service provider may completetasks and then record such tasks on the Field Document over a period oftime by suitably entering such information and periodically selectingthe save button 1018. Further, when entries to the Field Document arefinal, the service provider may save such entries and simultaneouslysubmit them to the system for review by the operator by selecting, forexample, the “save and Submit to Operator” button 1020.

Upon selection of button 1020, for this embodiment, the operator maytimely receive a message that a new Field Document has been prepared,which the Operator may access at any time. When the operator selects agiven Field Document from the list on a summary page, the system may befurther configured such that the operator may, for example, review theservice provider's cost entries for the project and compare them to theoriginal Bid Award amounts and any actual invoices received from theservice provider. Further, the system and user interface shown in FIGS.10A–10C (or other user interfaces) may be configured such that when anissue or subject matter arises that the operator desires to share withthe service provider, the operator may submit comments to the serviceprovider/vendor in a field, such as the “Comments for Vendor” field1022. Further, this embodiment may also be configured such that theoperator's portion of the Field Document includes an additional commentsection 1024 in which an operator may provide internal comments, forexample, comments directed to the operator's accounting department.

As such it is to be appreciated that the system embodiment illustratedby the user interfaces shown in FIGS. 9A, 9B, and 10A to 10C facilitatecommunications between an operator and at least one service provider.Such communications may be further enhanced by providing comment fields1022 and 1016. This and other information may be utilized, for example,to negotiate and agree upon a final cost figure or the like. Further,FIGS. 10A to 10C illustrate one embodiment of a user interfacecompatible with a system implementing the present invention. It is to beappreciated, however, that the operator's page may include additionalbuttons, for example, buttons, fields or other interfaces (all of whichare well known in the art) which enable the operator/user to save anycomments and submit them to the service provider.

Further, this system embodiment provides that during any negotiation, aField Document is “alive” and changes may be made to such Field Documentby the service provider, the operator or other authorized users.

When the operator and service provider reach agreement, buttons may beprovided by which the operator may approve a Field Document while alsosubmitting information on the Field Document to other interestedparties, for example, an operator's accounting department. If theoperator and service provider are unable to come to an agreement, thesystem/user interface may also be configured so that the operator maysubmit an unapproved Field Document which may include a hold for paymentrequest designation or some other designation which indicates to anaccounting department and/or others that a Field Document is not readyfor payment. Further, once the operator submits an approved and/or anunapproved Field Document to an accounting department, the cost fieldsmay also be locked by the system, while the operator and serviceprovider may still be able to exchange communications with each othervia the comment fields or other fields. Further, the system may beconfigured such that the operator may change any project levelinformation and accommodate any other changes, if any, to the operator'sinternal project designations and record keeping. Thus, it is to beappreciated that the system embodiment as reflected by the userinterfaces shown in FIGS. 9A, 9B, and 10A to 10C may include many otheradditional features and functions and that buttons and other userinterface devices (such as text entry fields, drop-down menus, and thelike) may be provided.

User Configurable Field Documents

Another embodiment of a system for implementing at least one aspect ofthe present invention is illustrated through the user interfaces, screendisplays, and/or templates shown in FIGS. 11A–F, 12A and 12B. As shownin FIG. 11A, the presentation of a Field Document may be modified toprovide greater navigability and organization for the user. Each of thepotential service and charge categories may be provided in a separatecollapsible window or combinations thereof. For example, the servicecharges 1008 (in FIG. 10A) may be collapsed into closed window 1102 (asshown in FIG. 11A) with only the total cost shown. Similarly, productcharges 1010 (in FIG. 10B) may be collapsed into closed window 1104 andthird party charges 1012 (in FIG. 10B) may be collapsed into closedwindow 1106. Each of these windows can be opened to display a fullitemized list of entries, as desired. Further, the system or softwareprocesses implementing this embodiment, may be configured such that eachtime a window is closed, the entries in the Field Document are saved.

If a service provider desires to attach any supporting documentation tothe Field Document, supporting documents may be attached after theentries to a particular Field Document have been saved by executing the“save” function 1108. It is to be appreciated, however, for otherembodiments, that supporting documents may be attached to a FieldDocument before or after the Field Document has been saved.

Referring again to the system embodiment shown in FIG. 11A, once theField Document has been saved, the system suitably presents an “AddAttachment” dialog box 1110, on the service provider's template, asshown in FIG. 11B. The system is preferably configured so that theattachment box 1110 function enables a service provider to attach anydesired documentation (e.g., summary reports, core sample charting, andproject designs), in any format (e.g., word processing files, spreadsheet files, and computer aided design files) to the Field Document forsubsequent review by the operator. When the Field Document is completeand any desired files are attached, the service provider may submit theField Document to the system for review and/or approval by the operator,for this embodiment, by choosing the “submit” function 1112. Uponsubmission of the Field Document, the system may automatically sendnotification to the operator that the Field Document is available forreview.

When the operator accesses the Field Document, the system desirablypresents an operator's user interface such as the one shown in FIG. 11C.As shown for this embodiment, the user interface includes collapsiblewindows, for example, the collapsed third party charges window 1114. Theinterface also enables the operator to view a detailed enumeration ofthird party charges, by selecting the expand button 1116 which, as iscommonly known in the art, expands a given window to occupy the entireviewable area of a given display. Further, the system may be configuredsuch that the operator can view the entries and charges in a read onlyformat. Read only formatting is preferably utilized so that the operatorcan not alter the information previously entered by the serviceprovider. However, the system does provide the operator with thecapability to enter internal comments about a given Field Document or anelement thereof by including an internal comments box 1118. Similarly,comments may also be directed to the service provider by making entriesin the service provider comments box 1120. Such comments to the serviceprovider may be, for example, an indication of changes to the FieldDocument requested by the operator before payment will be approved. Itis to be appreciated, that while the various embodiments of systems anduser interfaces described herein generally provide for the entry oftextual comments, the system and process embodiments of the presentinvention may also be configured to attach audio and/or video files,including audio commentary, to any Field Document, commercial response,work order and/or any other aspect of the present invention by whichinformation is communicated between various parties.

When an operator desires to approve a Field Document for payment, theoperator may select the “approve” function 1124, which function isillustrated in FIG. 11C as being implemented by selecting an approvebutton. If the operator wants the service provider to make changes tothe Field Document, for example, in response to comments entered in theservice provider comments box 1120, the operator so directs the systemby choosing the “hold for approval” function 1126. The operator may alsosave the Field Document template at any time by selecting the “save”function 1122. Additionally, if the operator wishes to attach a documentto the Field Document (for example, for review by the service provider),this action generally may be performed after the save function 1122 isselected, as shown in FIG. 11D. When the save function 1122 is selected,a file attachment box 1128, similar to that provided to the serviceprovider in FIG. 11B, may be provided to the operator with the samefunctionality of the service provider's attachment box 1110. Theoperator may wish to provide updated, edited, and/or corrected versionsof the attachments submitted by the service provider, or the operatormay wish to provide entirely new attachments.

When the operator selects either the approve function 1124 or the holdfor approval function 1126, the Field Document is suitably saved by thesystem and the service provider may be notified that the Field Documenthas been reviewed by the operator. It is to be appreciated, that a FieldDocument and other data or information utilized in conjunction with thevarious embodiments of the present invention may be saved in localand/or remote databases in data arrays, as objects in a SQL structure orotherwise.

Desirably, the service provider may view the operator's comments whenthe Field Document is accessed. If the Field Document has been held forapproval by the operator, the system desirably enables the serviceprovider to adjust the Field Document and make any internal notes byproviding an internal comment box 1130, as shown in FIG. 11E. Theservice provider may further indicate the changes made, or provide anyother communication to the operator, in the operator comment box 1132.Again, the service provider may save the Field Document at any time andreturn to it to complete the entries at a later time by selecting thesave function 1134. Selecting the save function 1134, as before, alsoallows the service provider to attach other files to the Field Document(see file attachment box 1138 in FIG. 11F). If the Field Document isready for resubmission for review by the operator, the “approve”function 1136 may be selected.

When the service provider selects the approve function 1136, for thisembodiment, the system may be configured to present the user interfaceshown in FIG. 11F. If the Field Document was previously approved by theoperator, and no further corrections have been entered by the serviceprovider, the system enables the service provider to send the FieldDocument directly to an invoicing program by providing an invoicingfunction which may be activated via the “Send to Invoicing” button 1140.Further, if the service provider made any changes to the Field Document,after initial approval by the operator, the system enables the serviceprovider to send such changes to the operator for approval beforesending the Field Document to invoicing by providing the “Send toOperator for Approval” button 1142.

In addition to the fields provided by the system for the Field Document,operators and services providers may also be provided user interfaces bywhich they may add their own, customizable fields to a Field Document.One example of a user interface for this customization process is theField Document setup interface 1202, as shown in FIG. 12A. By selectingthe “add new custom field function,” 1204 an operator or serviceprovider may insert a new field 1206 into the table, as shown. Thecustom fields may be labeled in any way desired, for example to keeptrack of particular account numbers or personnel responsible for a givenField Document. The custom fields may be designated as “read only,”“editable” by any party, or limited to “internal” presentation to agentsof the customizing party by selecting either the read only function1208, the editable function 1210, or the internal function 1212,respectively. Once created, each customized field may be displayed aspart of the Field Document template. For example, as shown in FIG. 12B,operator designated custom fields 1214 designated as “internal,” andtherefore viewable desirably by the operator only, may be provided belowthe internal operator comment box 1216.

Field Document Management Tool(s)

In order to manage a multiplicity of Field Documents associated with amultiplicity of projects, operators and service providers, anotherembodiment of the system may be configured to provide at least one FieldDocument management tool. An exemplary embodiment of a Field Documentmanagement tool is illustrated by the user interface templates shown inFIGS. 13A–B.

More specifically, a Field Document manager template 1300 provided foran operator is shown in FIG. 13A. This template 1300 enables an operatorto sort and/or search Field Documents by various categories. Filters maybe provided in the Field Document manager template 1300 and may be usedby operators to select the Field Documents to be displayed. Possiblefiltering criteria may include, for example:

-   -   a) by service provider name 1302, wherein the list of service        providers may include all service providers that have submitted        Field Documents;    -   b) by project 1304, wherein the selection list may include each        project name for which Field Documents have been submitted;    -   c) by well name 1306, for example, when used in an oil and gas        embodiment, wherein the list may include each well name for        which a Field Document has been submitted;    -   d) by Field Document status 1308, whereby the Field Documents        may be filtered by whether they have been received by the        operator, approved, held for approval or have any other status;        and    -   e) by Field Document date range 1310, wherein the filter may        offer commonly used date ranges for selection, or allow the        operator to enter a specific date range 1311 for Field Documents        to review.        It is to be appreciated that other categories may also be        utilized to filter Field Documents. Additionally, rather than        showing only Field Documents related to a selected project,        added functionality may be provided by allowing an operator to        hide all Field Documents related to a specific project, for        example, by selecting a check box 1305. A similar option may        also be provided with respect to well names, as depicted in the        Field Document manager template 1300 by check box 1307.        Additionally, a particular system embodiment may be configured        such that each filter may provide the option of displaying all        Field Documents. If the operator selects “all” as the filter for        the Field Document status filter 1308, the date range filter        1310 will not be able to accept a specific date range 1311.        Further, the date range filter 1310 will show only Field        Documents that have been modified to hold the selected Field        Document status 1308 within the given time frame.

The Field Document manager template 1300 for a particular systemembodiment, may also be configured to provide a listing of all FieldDocuments meeting the filter criteria. Preferably, such a listing isgenerated once the filtering criteria are established. But, the listingmay also be generated as each filtering option is selected, it isanticipated that such “on-the-fly” filtering may enable users to detectsubtle nuances between various Field Documents. The system also providesfor the sorting of Field Documents based upon at least one of aplurality of data attributes, which may or may not be selectable by auser. For example, Field Documents may be sorted by service provider1312, project name 1314, service type 1316, Field Document status 1318(e.g., whether or not the Field Document has been submitted, or perhapshas been approved or held by the operator), and Field Document approvaldate 1320. Other data fields may likewise be used for sorting purposesas desired by particular system embodiments. The Field Document listingmay also provide links to additional information associated withparticular Field Document data, for example:

-   -   a) a service type link 1322 may provide access to the service        request or work order;    -   b) a commercial response link 1324 may provide access to a        commercial response, for example, when the project was initiated        by a service request and the service provider completed a        commercial response; likewise, if the project was initiated with        a work order a link may not be provided;    -   c) a Field Document link 1326 may provide access to the most        recent version of the Field Document and thereby enable the        operator to approve, provide comment, or hold for approval a        given Field Document;    -   d) a reconciliation tool link 1328 may provide access to a        reconciling process, which may or may not be an element of the        system (one example of such a reconciling process is described        in greater detail herein below);    -   e) a collaboration link 1330 may provide access to a dialog        interface where the operator may review existing messages or        create new messages for the service provider regarding the        particular Field Document or other aspects of the project;        and/or    -   f) a workflow link 1332 may provide access to a workflow history        manager process (one embodiment of which is describe in greater        detail herein below) which enables an operator to review        significant changes that have been made to a given Field        Document, by whom such changes were made and when such changes        were made.

Additionally, the present system embodiment also provides a FieldDocument manager template 1350, as shown in FIG. 13B, for a serviceprovider. This template 1350 similarly enables a service provider tosort and/or search Field Documents based upon various categories.Filters may be provided in the template 1350 and suitably utilized toselect Field Documents to be displayed. Possible filtering criteria mayinclude, for example:

-   -   a) by operator's name 1352, wherein the list of operators may        include all operators that have submitted Field Documents;    -   b) by project 1354, wherein the selection list may include each        project name for which Field Documents have been submitted;    -   c) by well name 1356, wherein the list may include each well        name for which a Field Document has been submitted;    -   d) by Field Document status 1358, whereby the Field Documents        may be filtered by whether they have or have not been submitted        to the system, approved by the operator, held for approval by        the operator, approved by the service provider, sent to        invoicing, or otherwise designated; and/or    -   e) by Field Document date range 1360, wherein the filter may        offer commonly used date ranges for selection, or allow the        service provider to enter a specific date range 1361.        It is to be appreciated that other categories may also be        utilized to filter Field Documents.

Rather than showing only Field Documents related to a selected project,the system may be configured to provide additional functionality, forexample by enabling a service provider to hide all Field Documentsrelated to a specific project, for example, by selecting a check box1355. A similar option may be provided with respect to well names and/orother fields, as depicted on the template 1350 by check box 1357.Additionally, each filter may be configured (depending upon particularsystem embodiments utilized) to provide the option of displaying allField Documents. For example, if the service provider selects “all” asthe filter for Field Document status filter 1358, the date range filter1360 is desirably configured to not accept a specific date range 1361.However, in other system embodiments, the Template 1350 could beconfigured so that an “all” selection may relate to certain sub-fields,such as “all” Field Documents generated within a particular time period,regardless of other filter selections such as the Operator Name, theProject, or the Well Name. Further, the date range filter 1360 may alsobe configured to list only those Field Documents that have been modifiedand/or to hold the selected Field Document status 1358 within the giventime frame.

The template 1350, for a particular system embodiment, may also beconfigured to provide a listing of all Field Documents meeting thefilter criteria. Preferably, such a listing is generated once thefiltering criteria are established. But, the listing may also begenerated as each filtering option is selected, it is anticipated thatsuch “on-the-fly” filtering may enable users to detect subtle nuancesbetween various Field Documents. The system may also be configured suchthat a Field Document listing may further be sorted by a selection ofdata attributes, for example, by operator 1362, project name 1364,service type 1366, Field Document status 1368 (e.g., whether or not theField Document has been submitted, or perhaps has been approved or heldby the operator), and/or Field Document approval date 1370. Other datafields may likewise be used for sorting purposes as desired byparticular system embodiments. The Field Document listing may alsoprovide links to additional information associated with particular FieldDocument data, for example:

-   -   a) a service type link 1372 may provide access to a service        request or work order;    -   b) a commercial response link 1374 may provide access to a        commercial response, when the project was initiated by a service        request and the service provider completed a commercial        response; likewise, if the process was initiated with a work        order, a link may not be provided;    -   c) a Field Document link 1376 may provide access to the most        recent version of the Field Document and thereby enable the        service provider to submit, edit, provide comment, or take other        possible action with regard to a given Field Document;    -   d) a reconciliation tool link 1378 may provide access to a        reconciling process, which may or may not be an element of the        system (one example of such a reconciling process is described        in greater detail herein below);    -   e) a collaboration link 1380 may provide access to a dialog        interface where the service provider may review existing        messages or create new messages for the operator regarding the        particular Field Document or other aspects of the project; and    -   f) a workflow link 1382 may provide access to a workflow history        manager process (one embodiment of which is describe in greater        detail herein below) which enables a service provider to review        significant changes that have been made to a given Field        Document, by whom such changes were made, and when such changes        were made.

Reconciliation of Field Documents

Another embodiment of the present invention provides a process forreconciling a Field Document and a commercial response. This process maybe accomplished by utilizing a reconciliation tool (which ideally isprovided in software that has been loaded into a system implementing anembodiment of the present invention). The processes performed by anembodiment of such a reconciliation tool are depicted in the flowdiagrams of FIGS. 14A and 14B. It is to be appreciated, that for thisand other embodiments, certain common processes may be made available toboth the operator and service provider, such common processes areidentified by operation 1400 and are further described in greater detailherein below.

Initially, this process begins when a reconciliation tool template,which may be provided in an user interface or otherwise, is accessed bya user (operation 1402). Once the tool is accessed, the user identifiesat least one commercial response or work order in which they areinterested in reconciling and a list of Field Documents associated withthe selected commercial response(s) or work order(s) is presented to theuser (operation 1404).

Next, the process may be configured to present an interface from whichthe user may select which, if any, of the Field Documents on the list toreconcile (operation 1406). Once a user's selection has been made, aquery may then be initiated in order to determine whether the user hasselected less than all of the Field Documents listed for the selectedcommercial response(s) and/or work order(s)(operation 1408). If all ofthe Field Documents have been selected by the user, the processcontinues the reconciliation functions using all the filed FieldDocuments (operation 1410). However, if the number of Field Documentsselected is less than the total number of Field Documents, the processcontinues with performing the reconciliation functions with respect toonly the selected Field Documents (operation 1412).

When the user selects the reconciliation function (operation 1414), theprocess provides, for the selected Field Documents, data totals that aregenerally provided in reference to the discrete categories or fields ofdata collected in the Field Document(s) (operation 1416). Next, it isdetermined whether a commercial response or work order is associatedwith each of the selected Field Document(s) (operation 1418). If thereis a commercial response, a system implementing this process suitablyretrieves data totals for the fields of data in the commercial responsewhich relate to fields specified in a given related Field Document(operation 1420). It is to be appreciated that such data may be obtainedfrom local and/or remote databases.

Next, a comparison is made between the estimated data in the commercialresponse and the actual data provided in a given Field Document, or asum total when data is accessed from a plurality of Field Documents. Theresult of this comparison may be provided as the difference between thevalues (operation 1422). Additionally, a percentage difference betweenthe values of the commercial response and the Field Document(s) may becalculated and provided to the user (operation 1424). The process maythen end or may continue with the user reviewing the comparison data,and/or selecting other Field Document(s) to reconcile (operation 1406).Thus, it is to be appreciated that FIG. 14A provides one embodiment bywhich a user may select at least one commercial response and/or workorder, identify Field Documents to be reconciled against the selectedcommercial response(s) or work order(s), and obtain value and percentagedifferences between estimates and actual work performed for a givenproject.

FIG. 14B depicts another embodiment of a process for reconciling FieldDocuments. This process may be directed towards an operator, however,comparable processes may also be provided for a service provider. Morespecifically, this process begins when a user accesses an operator userinterface provided by a system or device implementing an embodiment ofthis process of the present invention (operation 1426). For theoperator's benefit, this process may be configured to enable an operatorto approve at least one Field Document for payment directly via a userinterface which includes a reconciliation tool (operation 1428). Theuser interface and this process may be configured to provide theoperator with a template which enables the operator to choose between atleast two input options. It is to be appreciated, that providing theoption of to pay or not to pay via a reconciliation tool may be highlydesirable because a result of such a decision will likely be based uponthe results of the reconciliation of at least one Field Document.

As shown, this process may also be configured to provide two function:an approval function, and a hold for approval function. When theoperator selects the approval function (operation 1430), the operatormay be provided an input field (for example, on a user interface), bywhich the user may add comments or information to the Field Document(operation 1432). Once any comments have been added (operation 1434), orif no comments were added, the Field Document is designated as approvedand is saved (operation 1436). Ideally, the approved Field Document issaved to a workflow platform provided by a system implementing thepresent invention. Such workflow platform generally may be accessed byother authorized users at any time. Alternatively, the approved FieldDocument may be saved in other systems, as desired, and accessed viaInternet connections or other connections.

Once a Field Document has been approved and/or saved, a notification maybe communicated to the service provider(s) associated with the FieldDocument (operation 1446). This notification may be communicated via anysuitable communications medium including, but not limited to, pagingsystems, e-mail, instant messaging, telephone messaging, teletype,facsimile, or the like.

Referring again to operation 1428, should the operator select the holdfor approval function (operation 1438), the operator may be provided theopportunity to add any comments or information to the Field Documentbefore submitting the Field Document to the service provider forrevision (operation 1440). Once any comments have been entered(operation 1442), or if no comments were added, the Field Document maybe designated as “held for approval” and saved (operation 1444). Anotification may then be communicated to the service provider that theField Document has been reviewed by the operator, designated as “heldfor approval” and is available for revision (operation 1446).

User Interfaces for Reconciling

FIGS. 15A–C provide an exemplary series of user interfaces/templates bywhich a service provider may utilize at least one embodiment of thebefore mentioned reconciliation process. Generally, the user interfacesshown in FIGS. 15A–15C provide a reconciliation tool which containssubstantially the same fields and functions for both the operator andthe service provider, since all but a few f the available functions ofthe reconciliation tool are provided to both parties. However, otherembodiments may utilize user interfaces and reconciliation tools whichmay substantially vary from an operator's perspective to a serviceprovider's perspective. All such variations are considered to be withinthe scope of the present invention.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 15A, Field Documents may be linked to aparticular commercial response. The reconciliatory tool template 1500 asuitably includes a header section in which project specific informationmay be provided, for example, the operator (or service provider) name1502, the well name 1504, and a service type description 1506. Further,a table 1511 may be provided in which comparisons between the totals ofvarious fields of Field Documents 1512, for example, the differentcategories of charges incurred, to the related commercial response 1508may be displayed. Another data field in the table 1511 may also includean indication of the status 1509 of the Field Documents 1512, i.e.,whether the Field Document has been submitted for approval, approved,held, or has been transferred for invoicing. Hyperlinks and other typesof links may also provide a user with access to the most recent versionof each actual Field Document 1512 via links 1512′ and similarly to thecommercial response 1508 via link 1508′. Similarly, links to theoriginal service request 1510 may also be provided to allow for reviewand comparison of all the project documents.

Further, it is to be appreciated that access to Field Documents,commercial responses, original service requests and/or other informationmay be provided immediately or on a delayed basis, in accordance withparticular system and/or user device configurations and/or limitations.For example, a user in the field may not have immediate access whencommunications links are inoperable between a user device and a systemor database at which a given Field Document or commercial response issaved.

The table 1511 shown in FIG. 15A may further include a Field Documenttotal calculation column 1514 in which combined total amounts for eachdiscrete data field of the Field Documents 1512 may be presented. Thesetotals may be obtained using, for example, known in the art columnadding formulas. The user interface may also provide a comparisonbetween the Field Document total amounts 1514 and the commercialresponse estimates 1508 as both an actual comparison 1518 (thedifference) and a percentage comparison 1520 (the difference divided bythe commercial response amount 1508). Again, such totals and percentagesmay be calculated utilizing well known in the art processes.

In essence, via the user interface provided in FIG. 15A, Field Documentsrelated to a particular service request can be presented to a user viaone reconciliation tool such as the table 1511. This feature of thepresent invention may be especially advantageous when Field Documentsubmissions or receipts may never reach a service provider or operator'saccounting department, the service may never be billed, or an invoicemay be received for which there is provided no evidence showing that thework was ever performed. Further, not only does this and otherembodiments of the present system keep track of all Field Documentsissued, it ensures that they are tied to the particular service request.Further, via a reconciliation tool, such as the embodiment shown in FIG.15A, when multiple Field Documents are issued for the same servicerequest, the Field Documents can be viewed together, along with thecommercial response, to determine whether the Field Documents track thecommercial response and/or whether there are discrepancies that requirefurther investigation.

Further, the present invention suitably supports reconciliation toolswhich enable a user to select which Field Document(s) to include forcomparisons and calculations. Such functionality may be provided invarious manners, for example, by a Field Document selection bar 1516, asshown in FIG. 15A. As shown in FIG. 15A, each of the Field Documents1512 associated with the particular service request 1510 may be selectedfor display in the table 1511. Similarly, FIG. 15B depicts areconciliation tool template 1500 b for the same service request 1510wherein a user has selected only two, 1516 b and 1516 c, out of thethree Field Documents possible via the Field Document selection bar1516. In order to update the table 1511 to reflect the selected FieldDocuments 1516 a and 1516 b, a “reconcile” function 1522 may be providedwhereby, upon selection, the table 1511 is recalculated with only theselected Field Documents 1512.

For example, when the first Field Document 1516 a on the Field Documentselection bar 1516 is not selected, the data associated with such FieldDocument may be excluded from the Field Documents 1512 displayed in thetable 1511. Further, in this example, because only two Field Documents1512 are provided in the table 1511, the actual comparison 1518 andpercentage comparison 1520 figures are different in this template 1500 bthan in the previous template 1500 a. Such comparison informationbetween estimates and actuals, between all Field Documents, or only asubset thereof, may be used to manage a project by facilitatingdeterminations as to whether there are cost overruns or savings, oradditional work is yet to be performed because the Field Document totals1514 do not reflect the totals in the commercial response 1508.

It is to be appreciated that numerous variations may be made to thereconciliation tool and how such tool may be presented to a user. Onesuch variation is shown in FIG. 15C. In this variation, a table 1511 maybe provided wherein the Field Documents 1512 are related to a work order1510′ rather than a commercial response 1510 (as shown in FIG. 15A). Thereconciliation tool, for this embodiment, may be configured to merelycalculate the totals 1514 of the selected Field Documents 1512. Sincethere generally is no underlying commercial response, there are nodifferences or percentages to calculate. Also, the user may be providedwith the option of choosing which Field Documents 1512 to reconcile byusing the Field Document selection bar 1516 and selecting the reconcilechecked items function 1522.

An embodiment of a user interface providing access to reconciliationtool by an operator is generally shown in FIG. 15D. As shown, thisembodiment provides for additional functionality in the reconciliationtool template 1500 d FIG. In this operator embodiment, generally, mostof the header information will be the same as that provided in theembodiment shown in FIGS. 15A to 15C. However, the service providerinformation 1502′ for the project may be provided instead of operatorinformation 1502. In addition to the before mentioned comparisoncapabilities, this embodiment may also be configured to enable anoperator to approve Field Documents for invoicing by the serviceprovider, or if there is some discrepancy, hold the Field Document forapproval pending resolution of the discrepancy. These Field Documentreview capabilities may be provided by the approve selected FieldDocument function 1524 and the hold selected Field Document function1526, respectively. Further, designation of particular Field Documents1512 for approval or holding may be provided by the selection of one ormore radio buttons 1528 on the template table 1511 next to the FieldDocument number 1512. Additionally, in at least one embodiment, theavailability of radio buttons 1528 is related to the status 1509 of theparticular Field Document. For example, if a particular Field Documenthas already been approved by an operator, then a radio button 1528 maynot be provided for selection of that particular Field Document forapproval or holding. Such selecting may be accomplished by selecting theapprove selected Field Document function 1524 or the hold selected FieldDocument function 1526. In short, this and other system embodiments maybe configured, as desired, to operate with other process embodimentsdescribed herein in order to provide an integrated system.

If an operator does select either the approve selected Field Documentfunction 1524 or the hold selected Field Document function 1526, amessage may be generated inquiring whether the operator would like toenter internal comments or comments for the service provider. If theoperator responds affirmatively, the particular Field Document may beaccessed for entry of the comments or other information, therebyassociating the information directly with the Field Document. If theoperator chooses not to enter comments, the Field Document may beapproved or held for later approval.

In another aspect of the invention, a workflow history tracking softwareapplication (i.e., a tool) may be provided to document the workflow ofat least one of the various embodiments of the Field Documentreconciliation and approval processes. This workflow history trackingtool may be configured to create a record providing various informationrelating to Field Documents and a project in general. For example, thetool may record an identification of a user (for example, an gent of theoperator or service provider's team), the action(s) taken by the user,and the date and time of such action(s) while also providing anindication of the Field Document, project, commercial response, workorder or other information accessed and/or modified by the user. It isto be appreciated that by creating a recorded history, uncertaintyfacing many projects can be reduced and/or eliminated. For example, theissue of whether a Field Document was ever submitted, by whom it wasauthorized, and by whom payment was authorized may be quickly resolvedwhen a workflow history tracking tool is utilized. Similarly, a workflowtracking tool may also eliminate or at least significantly reduce theincidence of time consuming searches for paper and/or computerizeddocuments, reconciliation of such documents against other documents, andthe verification of, for example, payment approvals and authorizationfor write-offs. In general, the workflow history tracking tool may beconfigured to utilize a relational database to provide the beforementioned and other features and functions.

Workflow History Tracking Tool

One embodiment of a process which may be utilized to provide a workflowhistory tracking tool is shown in FIG. 16. This embodiment is shown withrespect to a Field Document approval process. It is to be appreciated,however, that other embodiments of a workflow tracking tool may beutilized for processes utilized in conjunction with the variousembodiments of the present invention.

More specifically, for the embodiment shown in FIG. 16, the workflowpath status at each particular operation generally corresponds with anaction taken in relation to a Field Document or other document and maycorrespond to the state of such a document in a system database whereinat least one version of a particular Field Document may be stored. Forexample, in operation 1602, when a new Field Document is created by aservice provider, the workflow path may be configured to record theaction as “Field Document created” while a system database may indicatethe status of Field Document as being unsubmitted.

Further, if the Field Document is modified before submission to thesystem, the workflow path may be configured to identify the actionstaken as “current working copy of Field Document,” while a systemdatabase might continue to indicate the Field Document as beingunsubmitted, operation 1604. When the service provider submits a FieldDocument for approval, the database might recognize the status of aField Document as being “submitted” while the workflow path may indicateto the service provider that the Field Document was “submitted to theoperator,” operation 1606.

Similarly, when observed from an operator's point of view, once theField Document is submitted to the system by the service provider, thedatabase may be configured to identify to the operator the FieldDocument as being “received,” while the workflow manager may indicatethat no actions were taken and that the status of the Field Document wasstill “Submitted to the operator,” operation 1608. Further, when theoperator reviews, modifies, or comments upon the Field Document, theworkflow path may be configured to indicate that the Field Document is a“current working copy,” while the database may indicate the status ofthe Field Document as being “received,” operation 1610.

As mentioned previously with reference to other process embodiments, atthis point, the operator may be provided with two choices: the FieldDocument can either be approved or held for later approval. If the FieldDocument is approved by the operator, the workflow path may beconfigured to record this action as “approved by the operator,” whilethe database suitably stores the status of the Field Document as being“approved by operator,” operation 1612. Instead, if the Field Documentis held for approval by the operator, the database suitably stores thestatus of the Field Document as being “held for approval by theoperator” while the workflow path might be configured to record theactions as “held for approval by operator,” operation 1614.

In either event and as discussed previously, future action is generallyrequired by the service provider. In the case of an approved FieldDocument, the workflow path on the service provider side may beconfigured to indicate the approved status of the Field Document forexample by designating the Field Document's workflow as “Field Documentapproved by operator” and designating the status of the Field Documentin the database as being “approved by operator,” while also providingthe service provider access to the approved version of the FieldDocument in the database, operation 1616. If the service provideroptionally decides to additionally modify the approved Field Document, aworking copy may be saved in the database, and the workflow path may beconfigured to indicate the working status of the Field Document as“current working copy of Field Document,” operation 1618. If the serviceprovider approves of the modifications, or if optional modificationswere not made, the service provider will normally approve the FieldDocument, either for invoicing or resubmission to the operator, thedatabase may be configured to store the approved Field Document as being“approved by service provider,” and the workflow path may be configuredto reflect the last action as “approved by service provider,” operation1624. Further, if the Field Document was not modified by the serviceprovider after approval by the operator, the Field Document may betransferred to an invoicing process. In such event, the database may beconfigured to record the status of the Field Document as “sent toinvoicing,” while the workflow path may be configured to indicate thelast action for the Field Document as being “sent to invoicing,”operation 1626.

Referring again to operation 1614, in the case of a Field Document beingheld for approval by the operator, the service provider will generallybe notified of such status by an indication of “held for approval byoperator” while the workflow path may indicate that the last action onthe Field Document was “held for approval by operator,” operation 1620.If the service provider makes any modifications to the held FieldDocument, the workflow path may be configured to indicate the lastaction on the Field Document as being “current working copy,” while thedatabase might be configured to continue to represent the status of theField Document as being “held for approval by operator,” operation 1622.Once any modifications are made, the service provider will generallyapprove the Field Document, either for invoicing or resubmission to theoperator. The database may be configured to store the status of theapproved Field Document as being “approved by service provider,” and theworkflow path may be configured to reflect the last action as being“approved by service provider,” operation 1624. At this point, the FieldDocument may then proceed with operations 1626, as discussedhereinabove. More likely, however, because the Field Document was notapproved by the operator originally, the service provider may desire toresubmit the Field Document to the operator for approval, whereby thedatabase may be configured to indicate the status of the Field Documentas being “submitted,” while the workflow path may indicated the lastaction taken as being “submitted to operator,” operation 1628. Onceresubmitted, the workflow path cycle returns to operation 1608 on theoperator side for approval of the Field Document.

Therefore, as illustrated by the foregoing discussion and the processflow shown in FIG. 16, the workflow history tracking tool essentiallyprovides a process for tracking actions taken with respect to a givendocument or item of information. The foregoing example was provided withrespect to a Field Document, it is to be appreciated, however, thatvarious embodiments of the workflow tracking tool may also be utilizedto track actions taken with respect to bids, commercial responses, workorders, invoices and any other identifiable piece of information.

User Interfaces for Providing Workflow History Tracking

One embodiment of a user interface for providing workflow historytracking is shown in FIGS. 17A–H. More specifically, FIG. 17A providesone embodiment of a user interface which includes a workflow trackingtemplate that may be utilized to provide the point of view of anoperator. As shown, the workflow history may be suitably presented via atable containing various columns, such as: a column 1702 indicating apath taken by a given Field Document; a view column 1704 providing linkoptions by which an operator may view a specific version of a FieldDocument; a column 1706 identifying persons who have taken some actionwith respect to the Field Document; a column 1708 indicating suchperson's titles; and a column 1710 indicating the date and time aparticular action occurred. As shown, for this first template, theoperator may be advised, by corresponding entries in the table, that aField Document has been created 1714, and that the Field Document hasbeen submitted to the operator for review 1716. In this instance, if theoperator wishes to review and modify the Field Document, this may beaccomplished by selection of either the related links in the “view”column 1704, or by selection of the “review and process” function 1712.However, this functionality may not always be provided, because a given“view” link may not include or may only include a link which providesonly access to historical copies of the Field Document. In contrast, forthis embodiment, the review and process function 1712 is generallyconfigured to provide access to the current working version of the FieldDocument.

FIG. 17B depicts the next operation in the workflow process after theoperator has chosen to review the submitted Field Document. In thisembodiment, the current working copy of the Field Document 1718 islisted as the next entry in the table. Generally, this version of theField Document is only visible to the operator. The view link 1704 a maybe configured to retrieve and present to the operator the original FieldDocument submitted by the service provider. Similarly, the view link1704 b may be configured to retrieve and present the current workingversion of the Field Document. Upon selection of the review and processfunction 1712 the process may be configured to then access the currentversion of the Field Document with any changes to the submitted version1716.

FIG. 17C shows a next possible operation in the workflow process whereinthe operator has previously chosen to hold the Field Document forapproval 1720. When the operator approves or holds a Field Document forapproval, the process may be configured to remove the working copy ofthe Field Document 1718 (in FIG. 17B), changes the approval status toheld for approval 1720, identify the name 1706 and title 1708 of theperson who made the decision to hold the Field Document, and specify thedate and time 1710 the decision to hold was entered or logged into asystem implementing this embodiment. In this instance the review andprocess function 1712 (in FIG. 17B) generally is not accessible by anoperator because the service provider needs to take the next operationin the Field Document process. The view link 1704 a may be configuredcontinue to access the original Field Document submitted by the serviceprovider. Also, the view link 1704 c may be configured to access theField Document in which the operator changes, which resulted in the heldfor approval by Operator workflow condition, have been recorded.

FIG. 17D shows a possible next operation in the workflow process. Oncethe operator has held the Field Document for approval, the serviceprovider may resubmit 1722 the Field Document to the operator, perhapswith modifications to enhance the likelihood of approval. In thisinstance, the approval and hold options available to the operator maygenerally be the same as those described with reference to FIG. 17B. Theoperator may view and modify the resubmitted Field Document with theservice provider's modifications, for example, by selecting the reviewand process function 1712, or by selecting the view link 1704 d. Olderversions of the Field Document may also be accessed by the selection ofcorresponding view links 1704 a and 1704 c, while information aboutprevious reviewers 1706 and the dates and times 1710 of those reviewsmay also be provided.

FIG. 17E shows a next possible operation in the workflow process, theoperator's review of the resubmitted Field Document 1722. Preferably,the current working copy of the Field Document 1724 will only be visibleto the operator. The corresponding name 1706 and date 1710 shown arepresented as of the date and time of the last revision. The view link1704 b may be configured to take the operator to the original version ofthe Field Document submitted by the service provider. This versionshould be different from the second submitted Field Document 1722, whichmay be accessed through a separate view link 1704 d. Selection of theview link 1704 c similarly may be configured to provide access to theheld version of the Field Document returned to the service provider.View link 1704 e and the review and process function 1712 may each beconfigured to provide access to the current version of the FieldDocument as modified by the operator from the resubmitted Field Document1722.

FIG. 17F shows the next operation in the workflow process, approval ofthe Field Document by the operator. Once the operator approves the FieldDocument, the working copy entry 1724 (in FIG. 17E) may be replaced byan approved entry 1726. The review and process function 1712 (in FIG.17E) is not active because the next process operation should beundertaken by the service provider. The view link 1704 f may beconfigured to provide access to the latest changes to the Field Documentmade by the operator. The other view links 1704 generally provide accessto their respective Field Document versions, as previously describedhereinabove.

FIG. 17G depicts a possible next operation in the workflow process,approval of the Field Document by the service provider. The workflowhistory process documents the service provider's approval and enables anoperator to access an approved by service provider Field Document entry1728 through a related view link 1704 g.

FIG. 17H shows another operation in a workflow history process for aparticular Field Document. As shown, the template indicates, in a newentry, that the Field Document has been sent to invoicing 1730. Itshould be noted, that this same workflow tracking tool may also be usedto track the operations in an invoicing process while providing the samefeatures and functions. Further, it is to be appreciated that other,less and/or additional workflow actions may also be displayed by thisand/or other embodiments of a workflow tracking tool.

FIG. 18A depicts an initial workflow history user interface/template formanaging a Field Document from the point of view of the serviceprovider. As may be provided for an operator template, the workflowhistory may be represented via a table containing various columns, suchas: a column 1802 indicating a path taken by a given Field Document; aview column 1804 providing link options by which a service provider mayview a specific version of a Field Document; a column 1806 identifyingpersons who have taken some action with respect to the Field Document; acolumn 1808 indicating such person's titles; and a column 1810indicating the date and time a particular action occurred. As shown, forthis first template, the service provider may be advised, bycorresponding entries in the table, that a Field Document has beencreated 1814, and that a current working copy of the Field Document 1816is available for review. In this instance, if the service providerwishes to review and modify the Field Document, this may be accomplishedby selection of either the related links in the “view” column 1804, orby selection of the “review and process” function 1812. However, thisfunctionality may not always be provided, because a given row on thetable may not include a “view” link or may include a link which onlyprovides access to historical copies of the Field Document. Further, forthis embodiment, the review and process function 1812 is generallyconfigured to provide access to the current working version of the FieldDocument.

If any changes are made to the Field Document after it is first created,the current working copy entry may be updated to show who made the mostrecent changes, by name 1806 a and title 1808 a, and when the changeswere made, by date and time 1808 a, as shown in FIG. 18B. When the FieldDocument is submitted to the operator the working copy entry 1818 (asshown in FIG. 18B) is replaced by a submitted entry 1820 as shown inFIG. 18C and the associated personnel and date information is updated.

After the Field Document is submitted, desirably no changes can be madeto it. The ability to view the Field Document by selection of view link1804 is generally provided as a read only link and the review andprocess function 1812 (in FIG. 18B) is not active because the operatormust perform the next operation in the process. Once the Field Documentis approved by the operator, the workflow history may indicate suchstatus in an entry 1822 and the service provider may be able to see who18061 approved the Field Document and when 18101. The view link 1804 kmay be configured to access the originally prepared Field Document.Similarly, the view link 18041 may be configured to enable to providethe service provider with read only access to the approved FieldDocument. To make changes to the Field Document or process a finalapproval, the service provider may select the review and processfunction 1812. Further, if the service provider saves changes to theField Document, a current working copy entry 1824 may be created in theworkflow path (see FIG. 18E).

The service provider may give final approval of the Field Document orresubmit a modified Field Document to the operator. A Field Documentwith final service provider approval may be listed as an entry in theworkflow path 1826 in FIG. 18F. The service provider may then transferthe Field Document to an invoicing function for further processing. Inthis event, the workflow history tool may be configured to record thetransfer of the Field Document to invoicing also as an entry 1828 in thetable (see FIG. 18G).

Field Document Management Tools

Various embodiments of the present invention may also include an offlinemanager that allows a user to work with a Field Document offline using,for example, an Offline Component. While in the field, a user can enterinformation into or make selections within the Offline Component, andonce reconnected to the network, the information added or changes madeto the Offline Component may be uploaded to the actual web site througha communications network.

One embodiment of a process for assigning, managing and tracking FieldDocuments, both online and offline as an Offline Component, is shown inFIG. 19. As shown, this process may be suitably implemented when a useraccesses a Field Document Pricing Page (operation 1900). Once the pageis accessed, the process, and/or a system implementing the process, maybe configured to display the pricing page with an input alternativewhich enables a user to assign a Field Document either online or offline(operation 1902). A query may be communicated to the user as to whetherthe user desires to select online or offline processing (operation1904). If the online option is selected, the process continues withquerying whether a team member has been selected by the user to receivethe Offline Component (operation 1906). If a team member has beenselected, a notification may be communicated to the designated teammember, for example via an e-mail, that the team member is nowresponsible for some further action with respect to the Field Document(operation 1908). The workflow history, if any, may then be suitablyupdated to indicate that the assignment (operation 1928) has been givento a team member. Further updates the offline manager module may also beprovided, as necessary, to indicate an additional activity with respectto the Field Document (operation 1930).

If a team member is not selected, a query may be generated as to whetherthe user has indicated that the Field Document is to be submitted to acustomer representative of the operator (operation 1910). If so, anotherquery may be issued as to whether the Field Document is in fact onlineor is offline (operation 1912). If the Field Document is online,notification of submission of the Field Document for review and approvalmay be sent to the operator (operation 1932). If the Field Document isoffline, a notification may be sent to the user that a Field Documentcannot be submitted to the operator while the Field Document is offline(operation 1934). The display or other presentation medium may then bereset to the Field Document Pricing Page to allow the user to make anydesired inputs (operation 1904). If there is no user input directingsubmission of the Field Document to the operator, the user may besuitably informed that a team member must be selected in order toproceed with assigning a Field Document (operation 1914). Thisnotification may also include resetting the display to the FieldDocument Pricing Page in order to enable the user to make any desiredinputs (operation 1904).

Returning to the query of whether online or offline action is requestedby the user (operation 1904), in the instance where the user hasindicated an offline transmittal of the Field Document, a query may begenerated as to whether the user has indicated that the Field Documentis to be submitted to a customer representative of the operator(operation 1916). If this selection is affirmative, a check may beperformed to determine whether the Field Document is online (operation1912). If the Field Document is online, notification of submission ofthe Field Document for review and approval may be sent to the operator(operation 1932). If the Field Document is offline, a notification maybe sent to the user that a Field Document cannot be submitted to theoperator while the Field Document is offline (operation 1934). Again,the display may then be reset to the Field Document Pricing Page inorder to enable the user to make any desired inputs (operation 1904). Ifthere are no user inputs directing submission of the Field Document tothe operator, then a notification may be sent informing the user that ateam member must be selected in order to proceed with assigning a FieldDocument (operation 1914). Again, the display may be reset to thedisplay to the Field Document Pricing Page in order to enable the userto make any desired inputs (operation 1904).

If the Field Document is not to be presently submitted to the operator,another query may be issued as to whether a team member has beenselected by the user to receive the Offline Component (operation 1918).If a team member has been selected, a query may be issued to determinewhether the team member is new to the workflow process platform(operation 1920). If so, information about team member may be obtainedand the offline manager updated to include the additional information(operation 1922). After the team member information has been updated, orif the team member is not new, an Offline Component holding the FieldDocument may be created and the Offline Component may be synchronized tothe workflow platform (operation 1924). The designated Offline Componentmay be communicated to the team member via a communications network. Atthis point in the process, the team member is now responsible for somefurther action with respect to the Field Document (operation 1926). Theprocess then provides for the updating of the workflow history toindicate the assignment (operation 1928) and further updates of theoffline manager module to indicate an additional activity with respectto the Field Document (operation 1930).

On-line and Off-line Field Document Management using Offline Components

One embodiment of a user interface, which may be utilized in conjunctionwith the previously described above process is a Field Document PricingPage and which includes the necessary functionality to enable a user toassign a Field Document online or offline, is shown in FIG. 20. Asshown, generally an user can choose whether the Field Document is to besent offline or online using radio buttons 2002 and 2004. Further, thisparticular embodiment enables the user to access an existing database ofcustomer representatives using a drop down menu 2006. Similarly, theuser may access the existing database of team members by accessing asecond drop down menu 2008. The pricing page shown in FIG. 20 may alsobe equipped with button 2010 which enables the user to submit the FieldDocument to the selected operator and a second button 2012 which enablesthe user to send the Field Document to the selected team member.

Once assigned by the offline manager, Offline Components may further becanceled before they are resynchronized with the system. FIG. 21provides one embodiment of a flow diagram depicting an exemplary processfor canceling Offline Components. When a user first accesses the offlinemanager (operation 2100), a user device, for example, a lap top computeror a personal data assistant, which is configured to implement theprocess, suitably displays a list of Offline Components previouslyassigned and not yet synchronized with the system (operation 2102). Auser may select to cancel a particular Offline Component (operation2104). In this event, the device may query as to whether the user hasentered a reason for canceling the Offline Component (operation 2106).If the user has not indicated a reason for cancellation and selects thesave function (operation 2108), the device will then notify the userthat a reason for cancellation must be entered before the OfflineComponent will in fact be cancelled (operation 2112). Likewise, if theuser has not indicated a reason for cancellation and selects the cancelOffline Component function (operation 2110), he device will notify theuser that a reason for cancellation must be entered before the OfflineComponent will in fact be cancelled (operation 2112).

The device or system implementing this process may further provide aselection of reasons for cancellation of an Offline Component. If theuser did provide a reason for cancellation (in operation 2106), thedevice may further inquire as to whether any of the choices forcancellation provided by the device were used (operation 2114). If not,the user may be requested and/or required, in certain embodiments, toinput a reason for cancellation in a field provided (operation 2116).Once a reason for cancellation has been secured, the user may thenselect the cancel Offline Component function (operation 2118). Thedevice may be further configured to interject an interrogatory toconfirm that the user indeed wants to cancel the Offline Component(operation 2120). If the user confirms cancellation (operation 2122),the device cancels the Offline Component and restores as active on thedevice and/or the system the Field Document version before the OfflineComponent was assigned (operation 2124). It is to be appreciated thatwhen a user device does not have access to a system, the foregoingactions may be accomplished remotely and then updates provided, asnecessary to the system. Similarly, when a user device is connected viaa communications network or directly to a system, the foregoing actionsmay be suitably accomplished on either the user device and/or thesystem, with the necessary data and information passing therebetween toimplement the desired changes.

Additional embodiments of an offline manager are shown in FIGS. 22A–22C.More specifically, as shown in FIG. 22A, for at least one embodiment, anoffline manager may be configured to provide at least one of four majorfunctions: a listing of all Offline Components that have been checkedout, a listing of who checked out a particular Offline Component alongwith a date and time stamp, a listing of the type of Offline Component,and the ability to cancel an Offline Component. This embodiment (andother embodiments) of the offline manage may also include links to otherpages provided by the various embodiments of the present inventiondiscussed herein and/or to other pages. For example, the embodiment mayinclude a link 2202 to an eFT Manager, a link 2204 to the servicerequest or work order submitted by the operator, and a link 2206 to theeFT or Response Package.

When utilizing the offline manager feature, the current functionality ofthe workflow history may also be changed so that each time a new usermodifies a current working copy of a Field Document, a new version ofthe Field Document may be created and listed in the workflow history.One embodiment of a system implementing such functionality is depictedby the user interface shown in FIG. 23. As shown a “Previous Workingcopy of the eFT” 2302 may be created every time a user sends a FieldDocument to a different user either online or offline via an OfflineComponent. If an Offline Component is cancelled, such cancellation mayalso be shown in the workflow history. The Offline Component cancelledlink 2304 may be configured to present to the user a screen display oruser interface on which comments may be entered and/or presented as towhy the Offline Component was cancelled. Such screen may also shows whocancelled the Offline Component and when the Offline Component wascancelled by providing a date and time stamp. If the Offline Componentis offline, a View eFT link 2306 may be provided which enables the userto access generally a read only version of the Field Document before itwas provided offline. This link 2306 may be further configured topresent the given Field Document to the user and also to present apop-up message stating something to the effect that “The Field Documentis read only because it is currently offline.”

Another embodiment of system and/or process for processing FieldDocuments which operates separately or in conformance with the otherembodiments of the present invention, may include a modularizationfeature whereby multiple pages may be provided within a modular FieldDocument. It is to be appreciated that a modularization functionconsistent with the present invention preferably enables a serviceprovider to select the particular pages desired, and further to modifyeach page, as desired. As such, generally, a single long form containingmultiple parts or pages that are not used for a particular embodimentmay be avoided. Further, custom fields may also be created and/ordesignated by the service provider to appear on each modular page asdesired, for example, tracking numbers and other similar data may beincluded on custom forms, while not being included on other, non-customforms. Additionally, the modularization processes of the presentinvention generally make it more easy to add or subtract pages to aField Document and to create Field Documents which are tailored toindividual operators, as desired by a service provider.

In another embodiment of the present invention, which may be utilized inthe oil and gas industry and/or other industries, a modularizationfeature may be utilized in which a user is encouraged and/or required toutilize a Job Time & Activity Detail page, for example, one as shown inFIG. 24A. The embodiment may also be configured to require a user toutilize a Field Document Pricing Page, such as one shown in FIG. 25A.Similarly, a user may be encouraged or required to utilize a ProductList page, such as one shown in FIG. 26A. In other embodiments of theinvention, additional optional pages may also be utilized, required,added to or subtracted from a modular Field Document as desired.Further, when utilizing these and other customization features, customfields for the operator are generally located on the Pricing page whileand custom fields for the service provider are generally located on theJob Time & Activity Detail page.

When viewing any one page of a modular Field Document, it is to befurther appreciated that links to the other pages in the modular FieldDocument may be provided. Further, the status of each page may also bedisplayed next to each link. A page may also have a status associatedwith it, such as Final or Draft. However, generally, before a modularField Document may be submitted to an operator, all of the pages in theField Document should be saved and their status designated as Final.Modular Field Documents may also be configured to work with an OfflineManager in order to enable such modular Field Documents to be sent toother team members either offline or online.

User Interface for Job Time and Activity Monitoring

In another embodiment of the present invention, a user interface may beprovided by a system via which a first user may enter and other usersmay verify job time and job activity details. As shown in FIG. 24A, aJob Time & Activity Detail page 2400 may be provided. This page may bedesignated, as desired, as the main modular Field Document page. Whenthis page (or any other page) is designated as the main modular page,whenever a user clicks on a link to a particular Field Document, thesystem present page 2400 to the user instead of another page, such as,the Field Document Pricing Page. As depicted in FIGS. 24A to 24C, theJob Time & Activity page 2400 may be configured to include a headertable 2402, a work summary table 2404, a work detail table 2406, and anemployee time table 2408. Other fields may also be provided as specificimplementations require.

Additionally, various fields may be made available for customization onthis page 2400. For example, custom fields may be provided in the headertable 2402. Currently, six custom fields are provided and include thefollowing: company order no. 2410, pick up # 2412, trip miles 2414, workdone in state of 2416, and type of work 2418. These and/or other customfields may be configured to utilize text entry boxes, drop down menus,or other data entry techniques (such as voice memos).

Similarly, customizable options may be provided for the work summarytable 2404. For example, it may be possible to rename the work summary2404, the 24 hour summary 2420, and the 24 hour forecast 2422 fields, orto not include such fields at all, while including additional or otherfields. The user may also be provided with the capability of hiding,minimizing, maximizing or otherwise displaying the work summary table2404.

Referring now to FIG. 24B, activity category 2424 and trouble type 2426drop down menus may be also be provided and customizable within the workdetail table 2406. In addition, the user may choose to display or hidethe employee time table 2408. Further, as shown on FIG. 24C, links 2428,2430, 2432, 2434 and 2436 may be included on the Job Time & Activitypage 2400 as desired. The links depicted are: application home 2428, myworkflow 2430, eFT manager 2432, eFT workflow 2434 eFT summary 2436, andlogout 2438. Additional links to the eFT pricing page 2440 and eFTproduct list 2442 are shown on FIG. 24C along with their respectivestatuses (i.e. draft or final). Thus, it is to be appreciated that thejob time and activity detail page may be customized as particularimplementations of the present invention specify.

User Interface for Field Document Pricing

Referring now to FIG. 25A, one embodiment of a Field Document PricingPage 2500 is shown. This embodiment may be provided for animplementation of the present invention similar to that which wasdescribed in reference to FIGS. 8A–C. Further, FIGS. 25B and 25C providedepictions of a Field Document Pricing Page 2502 which may be utilized,for example, as part of a modular Field Document. As shown in FIGS. 25Aand 25B, a table 2504 containing an arrive location, job start, and jobcompletion fields, as shown in FIG. 25A, may be replaced or augmented,for example, with an additional pages table 2506 containing a link 2508to a Job Time & Activity page and or a second link 2510 to the a productlist page.

Various custom fields may also be made available to the operator on theField Document Pricing Page. For example and as shown in FIG. 25B,exemplary custom fields may be located on a header table 2512, and maybe described as follows: project mgt. system number 2514, work ordernumber 2516, cost center 2518, pay key code 2510, API number 2522 andfield supervisor name 2524. Similar to the Job Time & Activity page,links to other locations may be provided including links to anapplication home 2526, my workflow 2528, eFT manager 2530, eFT workflow2532, eFT summary 2534, and logout 2535.

Further, as shown in FIG. 25C, the bottom of the Field Document PricingPage of the modular Field Document may also be modified to include radiobuttons which enable a user to select, for example, whether to assignthe modular Field Document online 2536, or to send the Field Documentoffline 2538, e.g., via an Offline Component. Additionally, the FieldDocument Pricing Page may include a button 2540 that enables a user tosend the modular Field Document offline or online to a selected teammember and a button 2542 that enables the user to submit the modularField Document online to a customer representative of the operator.

User Interface for Product Listing

FIGS. 26A and 26B depict another embodiment of a user interface for thepresent invention in which a Field Document Product List page 2600 isincluded in a modular Field Document. As with other pages previouslydescribed hereinabove or to be described herein below, which may beincluded in a given modular Field Document page, a link to the Job Time& Activity page 2602 and a link to the Field Document Pricing Page 2604may be provided and/or displayed along with their respective statuses.In addition, and similar to the before mentioned Job Time & Activity andthe Field Document Pricing Pages, links may also be provided to thefollowing locations: application home 2606, my workflow 2608, eFTmanager 2610, eFT workflow 2612, eFT summary 2614, and logout 2616. Theservice provider name 2618 may also be displayed on the product listpage 2600. The date shown in the update field 2620 may also be the samedate entered in, for example, a pricing current as field on a FieldDocument Pricing Page. The eFT number 2622 shown may also be provided asa system generated eFT ID. As further shown in FIG. 26A, some fields mayalso be pre-populated from the Field Document Pricing Page and/or otherpages or information, for example, the operator name 2624, well name2626, and field name 2628 may be pre-populated.

Referring now to FIG. 26B, the product list page may be configured suchthat the user can check radio boxes 2630 next to the items in theproduct list to specify what items were used on a job site. The user mayalso choose check a pre-populate radio button 2632 in order to have thechecked items pre-populated onto the Field Document Pricing Page. It isto be appreciated that pre-populating the Field Document Pricing Pagewith frequently used items reduces the need to duplicate informationacross entries as new Field Documents are created. Further, thisfunction enables users to only enter quantities used and other taskspecific information while not having to repeatedly reenter commonlyutilized categories on the Field Document Pricing Page and/or otherpages.

Customization Manager

In another embodiment of the present invention, a customization managermay be provided. The customization manager enables a user to customizevarious aspects of systems, user interfaces, and/or process implementingthe present invention. For example, the customization manager mayprovide for customization of the Job Time & Activity page, the pricelist page, and the product list page within a modular Field Document.Similarly, custom fields, which may also require custom processing, mayalso be provided on work orders and invoices.

One embodiment of a process illustrating how the customization managerfeature may be utilized is provided with reference to the flow chartsshown in FIGS. 27A–F. Although not necessary, it may be desirable tolimit access to the customization manager in order to prevent thecreation of duplicate custom fields. Limiting access the customizationmanager may be achieved by utilizing a login routine, for example, onerequiring a username and password. Referring now to FIG. 27A, thisprocess begins when a user first logs into the customization manager(operation 2702). Once logged into the customization manager, which maybe suitably provided by a system or device configured commonly viasoftware or via hardcoding to provide such features, the user may selecta company type (operation 2704) and a unit type (operation 2706).Examples of company types are operator and service provider, andexamples of unit type are SI and English. In this embodiment, the systemthen determines whether an operator or service provider has beenselected as the company type (operation 2708).

If the system determines that an operator has been selected (operation2708), the system displays the list of operating company names within adatabase (operation 2710). The user may then select a company name(operation 2712). The system then refreshes the page to display a listof pages available for customization (operation 2714) for the particularcompany selected. The system may also be configured to then record theuser's customizations to various fields for display (operation 2722,FIG. 27B) and record the user's selections of pages where the customizedfields will be displayed (operation 2724). In one embodiment of thepresent invention, the system may provide a user with a choice ofdisplaying customized fields on the work order page, the Field Document,and/or the invoice page. In other embodiments, other customizable pagesmay be provided.

Once the user has completed any customizations to a selected page, thesystem determines if the user wishes to preview a particular page(operation 2728). If so, the system displays the particular page(operation 2730). If not, (the system determines if the user hasrequested to save the customizations as a draft version (operation 2732)and, if so, the system records the date of modification and the user'sname (operation 2734). The system may then assign the customized page astatus of “draft” and save the customized page in a database accessibleby the system (operation 2736).

However, if the system determines that the user did not request to savea draft version of the page (operation 2732), the system determines ifthe user requested to save a final version of the page (operation 2738).If so, the system records the date of modification and the user's name(operation 2740), assigns the customized page a status of “final” andsaves the customized page in a database accessible by the system(operation 2742).

Referring back to operation 2708 in FIG. 27A, if the system determinesthat an operator was not selected (i.e. a service provider wasselected), the system displays the list of service provider companynames obtained from a database accessible by the system (operation2716). Upon the user selecting a company name (operation 2718), thesystem refreshes the page to display a list of pages available forcustomization (operation 2720) for the selected company. The system thendisplays the page chosen by the user for customization. In oneembodiment of the present invention, the user may choose from among fourpages for customization. The available customizable pages for a serviceprovider may be the product/price, the Job Time & Activity page, thecustom invoice setup page, and a rig report. However, in otherembodiments additional and/or other pages may be available formodification, as particular needs require.

Referring now to FIG. 27C, the system may display the Job Time &Activity customization page if the operator so requests (operation2744). Upon entry by the user, the system may then record the page title(operation 2746) and any user's selections as to whether various customfields will be displayed (operation 2748). More specifically, the systemmay be configured to record text entered in the custom field by theuser, text/entries selected via a drop down menu in a custom fieldand/or entries otherwise provided by the user (operation 2750). Thesystem then determines whether the user has selected to use drop downmenus in the custom fields (operation 2752). If the system determinesthat the user has selected to use drop down menus (operation 2752), atemplate may be provided for entering choices in the drop down menu(operation 2754).

Next, the system records the user's choices whether to display or hidecustom fields on a Field Document (operation 2756). The system thenrecords the time and activity and trouble type drop down menus enteredby the user (operation 2758). The user then selects whether to displaythe drop down menus (operation 2760).

The system then records the employee information entered by the user(operation 2762). The system determines whether the user desires todisplay the employees' social security numbers (operation 2764). If so,the system creates a display field for the social security numbers(operation 2766).

Next, the system records the employee job classifications entered by theuser (operation 2768). The system then proceeds with operations2728–2742, as discussed previously hereinabove.

Referring again to operation 2720, on FIG. 27A, as mentioned above theservice provider may choose between various pages to customize. When theservice provider chooses to customize the product/price list screen fora service provider the process flow continues in FIG. 27D with operation2770. Upon entry by the user, the system will record the page title(operation 2772). The system then creates a new category for a categoryarray upon input by the user (operation 2774). A category name is thenstored in the array (operation 2776) and field information for eachfield in a category (i.e. product code, description, unit price, unitsof measure, and display) is recorded in the array (operation 2778).Essentially, the array provides descriptors of characteristics for agiven good or service. Once these descriptors have been entered, thesystem then proceeds with operations 2728–2742, as discussed previouslyhereinabove.

One embodiment of a user interface by which a system or device,providing the before mentioned customization features, may be accessedand/or utilized for at least one embodiment of the present invention isillustrated in FIGS. 28A to 28C. As shown in FIG. 28A, the beforementioned customization manager features may be accessed via a systemproviding web pages. It is to be appreciated, that such features mayalso be accessed in non-Web browser configured applications, such as anapplication providing a JavaScript or other customized applications. Asshown for this particular embodiment, the customization manager enablesa user to specify, for example, via a drop down menu, a unit type (e.g.SI or English) 2802, a company name 2804, and a company type 2806 (e.g.operator or service provider). When the user selects an operatingcompany or service provider company from the drop down menu, a system ordevice implementing this embodiment of a customization manager thenlists those pages, if any, which are available for customization and thestatus of each page. One example, of such a listing is provided in thetext box 2808 shown in FIG. 28B. As mentioned previously, this page maybe configured to present status information for any and/or allcustomizable pages, if any, in a status box 2810. For example, when theinitial 30 customization is started for a company, the status box 2810may be instructed to display “. . . ” indicating that no customizationshave been created for the company. The status may also indicate draft,final or other conditions. Also, operators and service providers mayhave different pages available for customization.

In one embodiment of the invention, the operator may create, edit anddisplay custom fields on the Work Order page, Field Document PricingPage, and the Invoice page. FIG. 28C depicts one embodiment of a userinterface which enables a user to select various custom fields to bedisplayed for an operator. The screen/user interface may bepre-populated with the operator name 2812 from the operator nameselected in the customization manager. The screen shown in FIG. 28C mayalso display other information such as the status of the page 2814 (i.e.final or draft), when it was last modified 2816, and who last modifiedit 2818. Customizable fields 2820 may also be listed. The user may alsobe provided with a selection as to whether to display a particularcustom field on a work order, a Field Document, and/or an Invoice bychecking the display on work order check box 2822, the display on FieldDocument check box 2824, or the display on invoice checkbox 2826,respectively. The user may also select whether a customizable field isto be read only, editable, or internal by clicking on the read onlyradio button 2828, the editable radio button 2830, or the internal radiobutton 2832, respectively. When a field is selected to be read only,ideally both operators and service providers may view the field, butonly the operators can make changes to the field. However, when a fieldis selected to be editable, either the service provider or the operatormay be permitted to view and/or make changes to the field.Alternatively, when a field is selected to be internal, the system isconfigured such that only an operator may view and make changes to thefield. The user may also add new custom fields by clicking on the addnew custom field button 2834. While and/or after the user has made anyselections, the user may preview the custom fields on the work orderpage by clicking on the preview work order button 2836. Similarly, theuser may preview the custom fields on the Field Document Pricing Page byclicking on the preview eFT pricing page button 2838. Similarly, theuser may save the page as a draft by clicking the save draft button2840, or the page may be saved as a final version by clicking the savefinal button 2842. Further, whenever the page is saved as a draft or afinal version, the Last Modified Date field 2816 and the Last ModifiedBy field 2818 may be automatically updated.

Referring now to FIG. 29A, as previously stated, when the user selects aservice provider company from the drop down menu, the userinterface/screen will refresh and list all the pages available forcustomization along with their respective statuses. For example, for theembodiment shown in FIG. 29A, the screens available for customization bythe service provider include a price/product list setup page 2902, atime/activity page setup 2904, an invoice setup 2906, and a rig reportsetup 2908. The status 2910 of each page may also be displayed.

If the user selects to customize the time/activity page setup, an userinterface/screen similar to those depicted in FIGS. 29B–29E may bedisplayed. The user interface/screen display may be pre-populated withthe service provider name 2912 (as shown in FIG. 29B). The serviceprovider name and other information may be pre-populated from earlierentries/information provided to and/or obtained by the customizationmanager. The screen shown in FIG. 29B may also display other informationsuch as the status of the page 2914, when the page was last modified2916, and who last modified the page 2918. The page name field 2920preferably, by default, displays job time & activity detail, but may bechanged by the user or may default to other information as desired forspecific embodiments of the present invention. Further, the page namefield 2920 generally will contain the name of the link listed on theField Document Pricing Page and eFT Product List pages. It is to beappreciated that these pages may be provided within a modular FieldDocument or otherwise. Because the custom fields on the Job Time &Activity page generally pertain to service providers, the system may beconfigured so that operators may view the pages, but may not edit thepages. Additionally, in other embodiments, the service provider may alsohave other internally customized fields which an operator may not beable to view and/or edit.

As shown in FIGS. 29B and 29C, various custom fields 2922 may beidentified and listed, for example, on the left hand side of the userinterface/screen. In the embodiments shown in FIGS. 29B and 29C, theservice provider is allowed a maximum of six custom fields. However, inother embodiments, more or less fields may be customizable. The serviceprovider may suitably select whether the custom field will be text boxesor drop down menus, for example, by selecting yes or no radio buttons,check boxes 2924 (as shown in FIG. 29B) or drop down menu options 2926(as shown in FIG. 29C). In one embodiment, if the user selects to use adrop down menu, a maximum of twenty-five choices may be listed in thedrop down menu. Similarly, the order of the custom fields may be alteredby changing the rank order of each field (as identified by the numbers2928 in the drop down menus on the left hand side of the screen). It isto be appreciated that other well known methods and techniques forordering fields on a page may also be utilized. Additionally, text entryfields 2922 may also be provided in which a user may manually input orobtain from another listing a description for each custom field. As isprovided for above with respect to the other options shown on FIG. 29C,the text entry fields may be pre-populated, populated via drop downmenus, populated by manual text entry or otherwise populated, asnecessary.

Referring now to FIG. 29D, the system may be configured to enable anuser to also edit a work summary table 2930. For example, in thisembodiment, the name of the work summary table may be changed, and thenames of the row headers within the table may also be changed. Thedefault name of the work summary table may be Work Summary, and thedefault row header names may be Work Summary 2932, 24 Hour Summary 2934,and 24 Hour Forecast 2936. Other header and/or row names may also beutilized as desired. The system may also be configured to enable theuser to choose whether to display the work summary table on a FieldDocument. This choice may be made, for example, by selecting “yes” or“no” from a drop down menu 2938. The fields may be displayed if theservice provider wants to allow the operator to run a rig report.

The system may also enable the user to define Time & Activity details.More specifically, a plurality of categories 2940 may be provided. Inthe present embodiment a maximum of 25 categories are permitted.Further, The system may allow the user to enter names in the text fieldsof the various Time & Activity categories. Further, the user may beprovided the option of designating particular categories to display inthe Time & Activity drop down menu, by suitably providing check boxes2942, radio buttons, drop down menus or the like.

As shown in FIG. 29E, this embodiment of a system and user interfaceassociated therewith may also enable a user may to enter employeeinformation, for example, in an Employee Information table 2946. Forexample, the user may be able to enter an employee's name 2948 and/orsocial security number 2950 in the appropriate fields. Further, inputtedemployee information may be recorded in a database accessible by thesystem once the user “clicks” on a Save and Add Employee button 2952 orotherwise designates that an entry is to be saved.

In a similar manner, the user may define various job classifications byentering a particular job classification in the Job Classification field2954. The system embodiment shown in FIG. 29E may be configured torecord the entered job classification when the user clicks on the Saveand Add a Job Classification button 2956. As shown in FIG. 29E, the usermay be provided some choices relating to where employee social securitynumbers are displayed and who may view them. For example, the systemenables a user to designate whether a social security number should bedisplayed on a Field Document by providing the “Do not display SocialSecurity Numbers on EFT radio button 2958. However, the system alsoenables the user to choose to have social security numbers displayed onField Documents, but on a restricted access basis, for example, so thatonly a service provider may view a social security number, by providinga “Display Social Security Numbers with name on eFT—Service ProviderView Only” radio button 2960. The system may also be configured toenable a user to choose to have employee social security numbersdisplayed on Field Documents for both the operator and service providerviews by providing the “Display Social Security Numbers with name oneFT—Operator and Service Provider Views” radio button 2962.

Further, the system enables a user to preview entries by providing apreview button 2964. When this button 2964 is selected or “clicked,” thesystem displays a preview of the Job Time & Activity Detail page. Thesystem also enables a user to choose whether to save the page as a draftversion or a final version by providing the Save Draft 2966 or SaveFinal buttons 2968. The system may also be configured to record theuser's work and update the status of the page to draft or final when thesave draft button 2966 or the save final button 2968 is selected.

As previously stated, an embodiment of the present invention may alsoenable a user to customize the Price/Product List page for a serviceprovider. As shown in FIG. 29A, when a user clicks on the Price/ProductList Setup link 2902 to access the customization screen, a page similarto that depicted in FIGS. 29F–29H may be displayed.

As shown in FIG. 29F, the user interface/screen may be pre-populatedwith the service provider name 2912 from the service provider nameselected in the customization manager. Further, the screens shown inFIGS. 29F, 29G and/or 29H may also display other information such as thestatus of the page 2914 (i.e. final or draft), when it was last modified2916, and who last modified it 2918. Further, the system/user interfacemay provide a page name field 2920 in which the name of the link listedon the Field Document Pricing Page and/or the Product List pages may bepresented. Because the custom fields on the Price/Product List pagepertain mainly to service providers, the system may be configured sothat operators may be able to view these pages, but may not edit them.In another embodiment, the service provider may also be presented orhave access to internal customized fields that an operator may not beable to view and/or edit.

The customization manager also enables a user to specify a category andenter various items within a particular category. For example, thesystem/user interface allows a user to specify a category name in theCategory Name field 2970. In one embodiment, the category name may belimited to twenty-five characters. Also, the system allows an user tospecify or provide data for each item in the fields below the CategoryName 2970. One such field, is the Item # field 2972, which is commonlyreferred to as the product code. In certain embodiments, the Item #field 2972 may be limited to fifteen characters and may be a requiredfield. Further, the system may be configured so that duplicate itemnumbers may not be entered, and to notify the user when a page is savedand duplicate numbers have been entered.

The system also allows a user to enter a description of an item in aDescription field 2974. The Description field 2974 may be limited tofifty characters, and may be a required field for this and/or otherembodiments. Similarly, the system allows a user to enter a unit ofmeasure in the Unit Price 2976 and the Units of Measure field 2978, forexample, using a drop down menu. The Units of Measure field 2978 may bea required field, and the choices in the drop down menu may be the sameas those provided in a given Field Document, if so desired. Examples ofchoices that may appear in the Units of Measure drop down menu includethe following: BBL, BBLS, CUFT, DAY, EACH, GAL/SACKS, GALLONS, HOUR,JOB, LB, MILES, MONTH, SACKS, FT, and GAL.

The system/user interface may also be configured so that a user maychoose a category from the drop down menu to insert into the WELLOGIXCategory field 2980. The WELLOGIX Category field 2980 may be a requiredfield, and the choices in the drop down menu may be the same as thoseprovided on a given Field Document. Examples of choices that may appearin the WELLOGIX Category drop down menu include the following: DeliveryCharges, Setup Charges, Service Charges, Product Charges, EquipmentCharges, Third Party Charges, and Taxes and Fees. The system desirablyalso allows the user to choose whether to display an item on the ProductList page of a modular Field Document by providing a display check box2982 which corresponds to a given item. Likewise, if the display radiobutton 2982 is not checked, the item, preferably, will not be displayed.

The system/user interface also provides the option of having entriesrecorded by the customization manager by providing a Save and AddAnother Item button 2984. When this button is selected, thecustomization manager desirably records the entries for the particularitem and displays a new row of blank entry fields in which a next item,if any, may be entered by the user. Once the user has completed entry ofall items pertaining to a particular category, the system enables theuser to create a new category by providing an Add A New Category button2986. When this button 2986 is selected or “clicked” the system recordsthe user's entries in the previous category and displays blank entryfields for the new category to be entered. Further, once the user hascompleted any desired entries, the system enables to the user to previewthe work/entries to date by providing a preview button 2964. When thisbutton 2964 is selected, the system then displays a preview of thePrice/Product List page. The user may also choose to save the page as adraft version or a final version by clicking on the Save Draft 2966 orSave Final buttons 2968 provided by the system on the user interface.The system will then record the user's work and update the status of thepage to draft or final.

Versioning with the Customization Manager

Embodiments of the customization manager conforming to the presentinvention may also include a versioning feature. Versioning allows theuser to change the operator and service provider custom fields andmaintains a history of previously used custom fields. In one embodimentof the present invention, three types of customization manager versionsmay be provided: a working copy version, a current active version, and apreviously created version. A version number may be assigned to eachgroup of documents managed by the customization manager. The versionnumbers may start, for example, with the number one (1) for the oldestversion and increment by one for each subsequently created version.Other numbering schemes may also be utilized. For example, a group ofdocuments managed in the customization manager for use between aparticular service provider and operator may have a working copy versionnumber three, a current active version number two, and previouslycreated version number one.

In one embodiment of the present invention, service providers may beprovided access to four types of documents (time and activity,price/product list, invoice, and rig report). Each of these types ofdocuments may be assigned unique version numbers. For example, the pagesfor service provider “A” and operator “B” within the customizationmanager with a version number six (6) may have the following versionnumbers:

Customization Manger - SP-A & O-B Version 6 Time and Activity Version 3Price and Product Version 2 Rig Report Version 2 Invoice Version 3Similarly, each custom page within the customization manager foroperators (work order, Field Document and invoice) may have a uniqueversion number. If changes are made to at least one page, the page maybe assigned a new version number by a customization manager. Similarly,the particular document group may also be assigned version numbers. Forexample, if a service provider changes at least one of the four pages ina document, and the changes are saved with a new version number, thecustomization manager may be configured to also assign a new versionnumber to the entire document. For instance, if the time and activitypage from the previous example is saved with a new version number 4, thecustomization manager may be configured to assign a new version number 7to the document group, as follows:

Customization Manger - SP-A & O-B Version 7 Time and Activity Version 4Price and Product Version 2 Rig Report Version 2 Invoice Version 3

The process describing how one embodiment of the versioning feature maybe provided is further described herein with reference to FIGS. 30A and30B. As shown in FIG. 30A, when a user accesses or “enters” anembodiment of a customization manger (operation 3002), a systemproviding a versioning feature may be configured to display a presentworking copy of a given document with a version number (operation 3004).The system may also be configured to issue a query as to whether arequest has been made by the user to display a current active version(operation 3006). If such a request has been made (eithercontemporaneously or prior) to display the current active version, thesystem retrieves and displays the current active version (operation3008). At this point, the user may then decide to close the currentactive version (operation 3010).

If the system determines that no request has been made to display thecurrent active version (operation 3006), the system then determineswhether a request has been made to display a previous version (operation3012). If a request has been made to display a previous version, thesystem retrieves and displays the previous version (operation 3014).Again, the user may then decide to close the previous version (operation3010). If the system determines that no request has been made to displaya previous version (operation 3012), the system then determines whethera request has been made to edit the working copy (operation 3016).

If a request has been made to edit the working copy (operation 3016),the system then displays the selected Field Document page to be editedalong with the version number of the page (operation 3018). As the useredits the page, the system may be configured to automatically,periodically or upon user request store the user edits made to thedesired custom fields within the page (operation 3020). The user mayalso choose to save the page as final (operation 3022), choose not tokeep the changes made to the page (operation 3024), or save the page asa draft (operation 3026). If the user saves the page as a draft(operation 3026), the system closes the page and again determineswhether a request has been made to display a current active version(operation 3006).

If the user chooses to save the page as final (operation 3022), thesystem automatically updates the version number of the page (operation3028). Alternatively, if the user chooses not to keep the changes madeto the page (operation 3024), the system retains the previous versionnumber of the page (operation 3030). The user may then choose to makethe working copy into the current version. At this point, the systemthen determines whether a request has been made to lock and change theworking copy into the current version (operation 3032). If no suchrequest has been made, the system closes the page and again determineswhether a request has been made to display a current active version(operation 3006).

If the system determines that a request has been made to lock and changethe working copy into the current version (operation 3032), the systemdetermines whether all pages have been saved as final (operation 3034).If all pages have not been saved as final, the system informs the userthat all pages must be saved as final before the working copy can beconverted into the current active version (operation 3036). However, ifall pages have been saved as final, the system queries the user toconfirm or cancel the user's instruction to convert the working copyinto the current active version (operation 3038). The system thendetermines whether the user has confirmed or cancelled his decision(operation 3040). If the decision was cancelled, the system does notupdate the working copy in the current active version (operation 3040).In contrast, if the decision was confirmed, the system converts theworking copy into the current active version (operation 3044) andretires and saves the prior active version (operation 3046). The usermay then choose to exit or remain in the customization manager. If thesystem determines that a request has been made to exit the customizationmanager (operation 3050), the system exits the user (operation 3052)from the customization manager. If the system determines that a requesthas not been made to exit the system (operation 3050), the system againattempts to display present working copy along with version number(operation 3004).

One embodiment of a user interface/screen prints which facilitates theabove described versioning processes for a customization manager isshown in FIGS. 31A and 31B. As shown, these user interfaces/screenprints illustrate how various attributes of a user interface may relateto at least one embodiment of the previously described versioningprocess. Referring now to FIG. 31A, as with the previously describedcustomization manager, upon entry into the customization manager andafter the user has selected a company type (i.e. operator or serviceprovider), a unit type 3104, and a company name 3106, the screen may berefreshed to display links to the various pages 3108 available forcustomization. However, when utilizing the versioning feature, a systemimplementing this feature may also include a version number to a workingcopy. Further, the system may be configured to o display by default apresent working copy of a version upon entry into the customizationmanager. If no working copy exists, the current active version may bedisplayed along with its version number. Whatever page is displayed, thesystem may be configured to display the version number of the currentactive version 3110 on the screen. The system may also inform the userwhich page is currently being displayed 3112. For example, the screendepicted in FIG. 31A shows that the current active version is “2,” andthe current view is of “Version 3—Working Copy.” The user may also beprovided with the option of selecting a different page to display, forexample, by selecting one from the drop down menu 3114.

As with the previously described customization manager, the system maybe configured so that the user interface enables the user to selectwhich available page to customize by clicking on its respective link3108. After clicking on the link, the system preferably displays theselected page. Referring now to FIG. 31B, a price/product list page 3116is displayed. The various attributes displayed on the page are notdifferent from the previously described customization managerprice/product list page with the exception that the version number 3118of the page is displayed. Therefore, it is to be appreciated that any ofthe previously hereinabove described user interfaces/screen displays,web pages, documents or other information may be suitably identified byversioning.

One embodiment of a system which may be utilized in conjunction withand/or to implement any of the foregoing embodiments of the presentinvention is shown in FIG. 32. As shown, this system 3200 is illustratedin the context of an Internet embodiment wherein there is one serviceprovider, one operator and a plurality of agents/users for each out inthe field. As such, it is to be appreciated that non-Internetembodiments, hybrid Internet and non-Internet embodiments and/orembodiments with multiple service providers and/or operators may beprovided.

More specifically, as shown for this illustrative embodiment, aplurality of user devices (preferably for use in the office and/or inthe field) may be used. These user devices include: a workstation 3202,for example, a Intel processor or Apple processor based personalcomputer or the like that is utilized by a field operator #1; a laptopcomputer 3204, which may also be configured with an Intel processor,Macintosh processor or other processor, and may be suitably utilized,for example, a service provider's agent; and a personal data assistant(PDA) or the like 3206 which may also be suitably utilized, in thisexample by a field operator's agent. As shown, each of these userdevices 3202, 3204, and/or 3206 may be suitably connected to theInternet 3210, via a communications medium 3222. It is to be appreciatedthat numerous mediums exist for establishing a communications linkbetween a user device and the Internet, any of which may be utilized inparticular embodiments of the present invention.

Further, the system 3200 also includes a server 3208. The server 3208provides the processing systems for implementing the above mentionedfeatures and functions of the present invention. One embodiment of sucha server is the WELLOGIX server which may be suitably accessed over anInternet connection via the URL www.wellogix.com. Other servers,singularly or in a plurality, may be utilized in conjunction with thevarious embodiments of the present invention. The system 3200 alsosuitably includes at least one database 3220 which may be accessed overthe Internet 3210 or otherwise. The database (which may be a distributeddatabase) suitably provides those storage functions discussedhereinabove and other data storage functions. Again, numerousembodiments of data storage devices, systems, and applications exist,any of which may be suitably utilized in conjunction with the presentinvention.

Also, generally the system 3200 includes a services provider's processor3213 which provides those service provider unique functions andfeatures. The processor 3213 may also be connected directly orindirectly to back-end office systems 3214. Similarly, an operatorprocessor 3216 may be included in the system 3200. Such processor 3216may also be connected directly or indirectly to back-end office systems.Therefore, in general a system implementing/facilitating/providing theabove mentioned features and functions of the present invention mayutilize practically any compatible data processing systems, databases,user devices, back-end accounting systems and communications mediums.

While the systems and processes of the present invention have beendescribed as encompassing numerous features, capabilities,architectures, and configurations, and depicted in detail for anInternet based embodiment, it is to be appreciated that the process ofthe present invention encompasses any and all combinations of these andcomparable embodiments and is not to be construed as being limited toany preferred embodiment, or the Internet based embodiments specified indetail herein. Additionally, modifications may be made to the processflow, techniques, equipment used, or any other element, factor, oroperation without departing from the scope of the present invention.

1. A process for capturing a state of a data input interface at aparticular time, the data input interface providing an interface forentering actual data to populate a field document, wherein the datainput interface is modified on a plurality of occasions to accept inputof additional or alternate types of actual data, wherein eachmodification of the data input interface is a version of the data inputinterface, the process operating within a workflow process, the workflowprocess controlled by a processing system, the workflow process designedto facilitate the preparation for and performance of a complex projectconducted between parties, wherein the parties are connected to theprocessing system via a communication network, the field documentdocumenting the performance of at least one component of the complexproject, the process comprising: saving a first version of the datainput interface, wherein a first set of actual data has been entered viathe first version of the interface; storing modifications to the firstversion of the data input interface to create a second version of thedata input interface; activating the second version of the data inputinterface, wherein a second set of data is entered via the secondversion of the data input interface; deactivating the first version ofthe data input interface to prevent further input of the actual data viathe first version of the data input interface.
 2. The process of claim1, wherein the step of deactivating further prevents display of thesecond set of data via the first version of the data input interface andpotential confusion of the parties through possible presentation of thesecond set of data via the first version of the data input interface isalleviated.
 3. The process of claim 1, further comprising displaying thesecond set of data via the second version of the data input interfacewhen the second set of data is accessed.
 4. The process of claim 1,further comprising displaying the first set of data via the firstversion of the data input interface when the first set of data isaccessed after deactivation of the first version of the data inputinterface, wherein potential confusion of the parties through possiblepresentation of the first set of data via the second version of the datainput interface is alleviated.
 5. A process for capturing a state of adata array module at a particular time in a workflow process controlledby a processing system, the data array module providing instructions forstoring actual data received via a field document in a data array in amemory portion of the processing system, wherein the data array moduleis modified on a plurality of occasions to provide instructions forstoring additional or alternate types of actual data, wherein eachmodification of the data array module is a version of the data arraymodule, the workflow process designed to facilitate the preparation forand performance of a complex project conducted between parties, whereinthe parties are connected to the processing system via a communicationnetwork, and wherein the actual data is received via a field documentthat documents the performance of at least one component of the complexproject, the process comprising: saving a first version of the dataarray module providing instructions for storing actual data in a firstdata array configuration; storing modifications to the first version ofthe data array module to create a second version of the data arraymodule; activating the second version of the data array module providinginstructions for storing actual data in a second data arrayconfiguration; deactivating the first version of the data array moduleto prevent further storing of actual data according to the instructionsof the first version of the data array module.
 6. The process of claim5, wherein the step of activating further prevents actual data storedvia instructions of the first version of the data array module frombeing accessed by instructions of the second version of the data arraymodule.
 7. The process of claim 5, wherein the step of deactivatingfurther prevents actual data stored via instructions of the secondversion of the data array module from being accessed by instructions ofthe first version of the data array module.
 8. The process of claim 5,wherein the step of deactivating provides for actual data stored in thefirst data array configuration to be accessed by the instructions of thefirst version of the data array module.
 9. The process of claim 5,wherein the step of activating provides for actual data stored in thesecond data array configuration to be accessed by the instructions ofthe second version of the data array module.
 10. The process of claim 1or 5, wherein the actual data comprises an actual cost of goods,services, or both provided in the performance of the at least onecomponent of the complex project.
 11. The process of claim 1 or 5,wherein the actual data comprises an actual accounting of goods,services, or both provided in the performance of the at least onecomponent of the complex project.
 12. The process of claim 1 or 5,wherein the actual data comprises a measurement of a technicalspecification defining the complex project.
 13. The process of claim 1or 5, wherein the complex project is defined in terms of at least oneparameter and the actual data comprises at least one measurement of theat least one parameter documenting the performance of the at least onecomponent of the complex project.
 14. The process of claim 13, whereinthe at least one parameter is selected from a group comprising thefollowing: physical, functional, temporal, financial, transactional, andgeographical parameters.
 15. The process of claim 1 or 5, wherein thecommunication network is selected from a group comprising the following:the Internet, an intranet, a cable network, a telephone network, awireless network, a voice network, a frame-relay broadband network, alocal area network, a wide area network, a public network, and a privatenetwork.
 16. The process of claim 1 or 5, wherein the communicationnetwork operates over at least one of the transmission mediums selectedfrom a group comprising the following: telephony, wireless telephony,digital subscriber line, two-way cable, fiber optic, radio,point-to-point microwave, and satellite.
 17. The process of claim 1 or5, wherein the complex project further comprises one of a type selectedfrom a group comprising the following: oil and gas exploration andproduction, construction, manufacture of complex products, and provisionof specialized services.
 18. A system for capturing a state of a dataarray module in a workflow process at a particular time, wherein thedata array module is modified on a plurality of occasions to provideinstructions for storing additional or alternate types of actual data,wherein each modification of the data array module is a version of thedata array module, the workflow process designed to facilitate thepreparation for and performance of a complex project conducted betweenparties, wherein the parties are connected to the processing system viaa communication network, and wherein the actual data is received via afield document that documents the performance of at least one componentof the complex project, the system comprising: a memory that storesactual data received via a field document in a data array according toinstructions provided by the data array module; and a processor that:saves to the memory a first version of the data array module providinginstructions for storing actual data in a first data arrayconfiguration; modifies the first version of the data array module tocreate a second version of the data array module; saves to the memorythe second version of the data array module; activates the secondversion of the data array module to provide instructions for storingactual data in a second data array configuration; and deactivates thefirst version of the data array module to prevent further storing ofactual data according to the instructions of the first version of thedata array module.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the processorfurther prevents actual data stored via instructions of the firstversion of the data array module from being accessed by instructions ofthe second version of the data array module.
 20. The system of claim 18,wherein the processor further prevents actual data stored viainstructions of the second version of the data array module from beingaccessed by instructions of the first version of the data array module.21. The system of claim 18, wherein the processor accesses actual datastored in the first data array configuration via instructions of thefirst version of the data array module.
 22. The system of claim 18,wherein the processor access actual data stored in the second data arrayconfiguration via instructions of the second version of the data arraymodule.
 23. The system of claim 18, wherein the actual data comprises anactual cost of goods, services, or both provided in the performance ofthe at least one component of the complex project.
 24. The system ofclaim 18, wherein the actual data comprises an actual accounting ofgoods, services, or both provided in the performance of the at least onecomponent of the complex project.
 25. The system of claim 18, whereinthe actual data comprises a measurement of a technical specificationdefining the complex project.
 26. The system of claim 18, wherein thecomplex project is defined in terms of at least one parameter and theactual data comprises at least one measurement of the at least oneparameter documenting the performance of the at least one component ofthe complex project.
 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the at leastone parameter is selected from a group comprising the following:physical, functional, temporal, financial, transactional, andgeographical parameters.
 28. The system of claim 18, wherein thecommunication network is selected from a group comprising the following:the Internet, an intranet, a cable network, a telephone network, awireless network, a voice network, a frame-relay broadband network, alocal area network, a wide area network, a public network, and a privatenetwork.
 29. The system of claim 18, wherein the communication networkoperates over at least one of the transmission mediums selected from agroup comprising the following: telephony, wireless telephony, digitalsubscriber line, two-way cable, fiber optic, radio, point-to-pointmicrowave, and satellite.
 30. The system of claim 18, wherein thecomplex project further comprises one of a type selected from a groupcomprising the following: oil and gas exploration and production,construction, manufacture of complex products, and provision ofspecialized services.